- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: the size differential in the trenches.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:38 pm to bisonduck
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:38 pm to bisonduck
ONCE AGAIN>>>
you compare our OL to your OL, and our DL to your DL.
Our OL outweighs your DL (We play O v D around here) by around 37 lbs. Yours outweighs our D by 26.
We are a bit bigger.
But it is a dumb, meaningless debate. I am just tired of seeing all opponents of ours making matchup predictions off of like units...not the units they will be facing on the field.
you compare our OL to your OL, and our DL to your DL.
Our OL outweighs your DL (We play O v D around here) by around 37 lbs. Yours outweighs our D by 26.
We are a bit bigger.
But it is a dumb, meaningless debate. I am just tired of seeing all opponents of ours making matchup predictions off of like units...not the units they will be facing on the field.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:39 pm to tigerfoot
That is why I said the size differential is 10.25 which is 37-26.75.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)