re: Stop it with all the "there will likely be no charges"

quote:

---

I called you an a-hole specifically

---

For what reason? Because you know me personally? Because it enhances the validity of your argument?

quote:

---

Your level of vociferous protest has not been in any way, shape, or form evenly divided for the "players" or the "victims" as it were.

---

All I have said is that JJ was "involved."

Involved:

1.
very intricate or complex: an involved reply.

2.
implicated: involved in crime.

3.
concerned in some affair, especially in a way likely to cause danger or unpleasantness: I didn't call the police because I didn't want to get involved.

4.
committed or engaged, as in a political cause or artistic movement: The civil rights demonstration attracted the involved young people of the area.

Is this not true? By all media accounts, JJ was "involved." I just called into question the validity of a off-beat news report.

I made no accusations as to guilt or innocence.

quote:

---

Your intentions are transparent. If the players were and are guilty of an animalistic attack with no provocation of course they should be prosecuted, but thus far we have only heresay and anonymous eyewitness accounts over the internet.

---

I agree.

quote:

---

It is too early to push either side and if you were impartial you would realize this.

---

I do. I am just saying it's not like JJ was at home, asleep in his bed when the fight went down. There are several accounts of him being at the scence. There are varying accounts of his participation in the fisticuffs. His implication has necessarily involved him in the situation. As a side note, I added that I don't think that an innocent bystander would actively seek cousel in such a situation unless he thought he needed it for some reason.