re: Stop it with all the "there will likely be no charges"

quote:

---

Has ANYONE denied that the players in question were "involved" in the incident? If this is the only agenda you are pushing and no one is pushing back, why are you still posting?

---

Yes. Rosetta. How is this having an agenda?

quote:

---

You really are a transparent douchebag who has no idea whatsoever what you are talking about.

---

Transparent? I think you used the wrong adjective here, buddy.

quote:

---

You assumed that JJ was "involved", whenever in actuality his name was being brought up as "accused" of being involved and maybe even kicking someone in the head>

---

JJ was at the scene. He hasn't been formally accused of anything, ie charges brought against him. He was, by definition, involved in the situation.

quote:

---

It was known his name was out there friday. That, my friend is an accusation.

---

Really? Legally, I don't think so.

quote:

---

I never said the police accused him of anything, but the speculation prompted him to get legal counsel, not necessarily his involvement.

---

So if someone randoly speculates that you burgled a home, the first thing you do is hire counsel? If you legitimately had nothing to do with the situation, you don't establish your alibi with the police to help absolve you? Why do you immediately need counsel, especially if you havent been charged, or even named a suspect or person of interest?