- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Review of Conan the Barbarian
Posted on 8/19/11 at 6:15 pm to Max Power
Posted on 8/19/11 at 6:15 pm to Max Power
So why would he risk his life for her? That is where the incongruity exists. The movie tries to paint a budding romance where she transforms from a monk to a warrior, gaining his respect and love. They seal their relationship through passionate love making, and then she slips into the night without saying goodbye. It's one thing to paint him as a barbarian without any virtuous feelings, but in their relationship there is some virtue, or at least the director attempts to show that there is, but then in the next scene completely turns on what he had been building. If the writer or director had Conan leaving her after the intercourse, I might try to give the writer/director the benefit of the doubt, and offer that Conan is a conflicted character who is capable of love, but cannot escape his past. But the woman who is a monk? She's the one who leaves a man after sharing love? I know I've already put more thought into this relationship than the writer and director. Writing so poor doesn't even deserve to be analyzed. I'm wasting my time.
I'm sure some people will enjoy the movie, but for me it was an unpleasant time.
I'm sure some people will enjoy the movie, but for me it was an unpleasant time.
2
Posted on 8/19/11 at 6:28 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
So why would he risk his life for her? That is where the incongruity exists.
I've seen this in a few of the old Conan yarns. Conan wanders around Hyboria and stuff happens around him. He also gets involved in dealing with damsels, which Tamara was in this movie. It's practically not uncommon in those stories.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 6:40 pm to TulaneLSU
I'm a huge Howard fan so my take on this movie has to pass through the filter of my fandom.
Costuming was great with the exception of the witch. Mamoa really does bring to mind Conan's visceral adrenaline fueled personality. In this respect he is a much better Conan than Arnie. The movie is pretty with some nice sweeping vistas that I enjoyed.
On to the bad.
Pacing sucked. It felt like a 5 hour movie that had been chopped down to the highlights. The story hops from city to city and country side to country side with no sense of distance or time. They are just all of a sudden there. Throughout the movie you are given tantalizing hints of a deep back story concerning several of the characters both good and bad, but those stories are never ever told. Instead the characters are simply two dimensional archetypes.
Nitpicky stuff about the film:
There were six Barbarian chieftains who surrendered to serve Zim, but only three of them are seen and dealt with by Conan.
Come on a sword slicing through a womb and passing inches next to a fetuses head? That's how you open the movie.
Conan was once again supposed to solve the riddle of steel, but he never learned a damn thing about ice did he?
Secondary characters are just there to get Conan somewhere or open a door. None of them are treated like Mako or Gerry Lopez's characters were and actually given something to do.
The hopping around from place to place drove me batshit crazy.
I don't think I'm too picky. This movie coud have been good and Jason Mamoa could have been this generations Conan, but poor writing/editing and direction killed this movie.
They should have focused on one small story and not tried to make an epic. Conan was never about epics. His stories were small, close, gritty and personal.
And another thing... Why does Conan's family always have to die in the movies and why is his Father's sword this big deal. That was never ever in any of the stories.
I think I put 1982 Conan the Barbarian above this one.
Oh and why in a story that is completely non canon do you mention the events that take place in the "Tower of the Elephant"?
Costuming was great with the exception of the witch. Mamoa really does bring to mind Conan's visceral adrenaline fueled personality. In this respect he is a much better Conan than Arnie. The movie is pretty with some nice sweeping vistas that I enjoyed.
On to the bad.
Pacing sucked. It felt like a 5 hour movie that had been chopped down to the highlights. The story hops from city to city and country side to country side with no sense of distance or time. They are just all of a sudden there. Throughout the movie you are given tantalizing hints of a deep back story concerning several of the characters both good and bad, but those stories are never ever told. Instead the characters are simply two dimensional archetypes.
Nitpicky stuff about the film:
There were six Barbarian chieftains who surrendered to serve Zim, but only three of them are seen and dealt with by Conan.
Come on a sword slicing through a womb and passing inches next to a fetuses head? That's how you open the movie.
Conan was once again supposed to solve the riddle of steel, but he never learned a damn thing about ice did he?
Secondary characters are just there to get Conan somewhere or open a door. None of them are treated like Mako or Gerry Lopez's characters were and actually given something to do.
The hopping around from place to place drove me batshit crazy.
I don't think I'm too picky. This movie coud have been good and Jason Mamoa could have been this generations Conan, but poor writing/editing and direction killed this movie.
They should have focused on one small story and not tried to make an epic. Conan was never about epics. His stories were small, close, gritty and personal.
And another thing... Why does Conan's family always have to die in the movies and why is his Father's sword this big deal. That was never ever in any of the stories.
I think I put 1982 Conan the Barbarian above this one.
Oh and why in a story that is completely non canon do you mention the events that take place in the "Tower of the Elephant"?
This post was edited on 8/19/11 at 6:43 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News