Started By
Message

re: Review of Conan the Barbarian

Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:51 am to
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37493 posts
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:51 am to
quote:

By comparison to John Milius' Conan the Barbarian (1982), I consider this not only a superior Conan film, but a superior film overall.


I mean this may be good, but I don't see how that is possible.
Posted by Deathrider
Member since Aug 2010
3675 posts
Posted on 8/19/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I mean this may be good, but I don't see how that is possible.


Milius' Conan had its share of flaws. As a Conan film, it failed on many levels. It drew material from different Howard characters. Arnold as Conan isn't a good representation of Conan. Everything about Conan is wrong in it. The score is fantastic, there are a handful of quotable lines, and the action is at least good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram