- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Review of Conan the Barbarian
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:51 am to Deathrider
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:51 am to Deathrider
quote:
By comparison to John Milius' Conan the Barbarian (1982), I consider this not only a superior Conan film, but a superior film overall.
I mean this may be good, but I don't see how that is possible.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 12:17 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
I mean this may be good, but I don't see how that is possible.
Milius' Conan had its share of flaws. As a Conan film, it failed on many levels. It drew material from different Howard characters. Arnold as Conan isn't a good representation of Conan. Everything about Conan is wrong in it. The score is fantastic, there are a handful of quotable lines, and the action is at least good.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)