- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why is full frontal male nudity ok in movies now but we never see a snatch?
Posted on 5/27/11 at 11:59 am
Posted on 5/27/11 at 11:59 am
What up wit dat?
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:00 pm to hendersonshands
The full frontal female kid of sucks. It's like it's mandatory they have huge bushes.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:01 pm to hendersonshands
Most snatches are not aesthetically pleasing.
:nohomo:
:nohomo:
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:04 pm to Cajun Revolution
I'm not talking about pubic area. I want to see some labia.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:04 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
Most snatches are not aesthetically pleasing.
I assume you mean the 70's-esque ones that the ratings folks force upon us in R rated movies. Not actual nice, clean shaven twizzes.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:05 pm to hendersonshands
This Film Is Not Yet Rated is a good documentary on film ratings/nudity in Hollywood.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:09 pm to hendersonshands
I'd love to see some labia too but I doubt that's going to happen. Showing tits just became mainstream.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:10 pm to alajones
I'm just saying that most of the chicks in these types of movies are probably giving roast beef sandwiches a run for their money.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:14 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
Most snatches are not aesthetically pleasing.
But johnsons are???
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:18 pm to theunknownknight
Who here is thinking about johnsons?
Know how I know you're gay?
Know how I know you're gay?
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:19 pm to 9Fiddy
Johnsons, snatch...
All I know is I'm craving a roast beef sammich now...
All I know is I'm craving a roast beef sammich now...
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:21 pm to hendersonshands
Obviously you've never seen Short Cuts.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:26 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
Who here is thinking about johnsons?
Let's see:
quote:
Why is full frontal male nudity ok in movies now but we never see a snatch?
The BUT conjunction implies a comparison between the two.
You responded "[because] Most snatches are not aesthetically pleasing."
The because is obviously implied because you were responding to an opened question initiated by a "Why".
You said, ergo, that johnsons were pretty.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:36 pm to hendersonshands
Well, in the instances I can think of, the male full frontal was done for comedic purposes, ie. Forgetting Sarah Marshal. There's not much humor in female full frontal.
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:43 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
Meg Ryan showed it
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:46 pm to vilma4prez
quote:
All I know is I'm craving a roast beef sammich now...
well at least you ain't craving a hot sausage po boy
Posted on 5/27/11 at 12:50 pm to HideChaKidz
quote:
well at least you ain't craving a hot sausage po boy
Well now I am... wait.... but I eat it from the middle.. not long ways... thats super queer
Back to top


8





