Started By
Message
locked post

Can't play fast paced games

Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:34 pm
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:34 pm
For the past 4 years or so if teams take us out of the usual offense of CP3 taking the air out of the ball, 88-85 type games we get blown out, which is weird i guess considering CP3's speed you would think he would thrive in that kind of offense, definitely the Thornton trade didn't help.
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18886 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:36 pm to
And our next game is against the Suns.
And:
quote:

the Thornton trade didn't help.

you are 100% wrong.
Posted by white_kong
Burbank
Member since Jan 2006
214 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:40 pm to
*cough* *cough* 12 points through 1.

Hate on.
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18886 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:42 pm to
I like Thornton, but we are better with Landry than we were with Thornton.
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:43 pm to
Not if we're playing a team like Denver.
Posted by TigerWise
Front Seat of an Uber
Member since Sep 2010
35131 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:58 pm to
Can't give up 17 3pts, no matter who we play or what the pace of the game is?
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Can't give up 17 3pts, no matter who we play or what the pace of the game is?



ditto, i don't think it was anything about the offense, it was the defense. period.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

*cough* *cough* 12 points through 1.

Hate on.


you feel good about that? Playoffs. hate on.
Posted by white_kong
Burbank
Member since Jan 2006
214 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:11 pm to
quote:



you feel good about that? Playoffs. hate on.


*cough* *cough* 26 at the half.

I actually do like Landry and believe the trade was beneficial if we never used Thornton anyway, but stop posting in any thread related to Marcus Thornton b/c you continue to make yourself look foolish with your blind hatred towards him.

And yes I realize Thornton plays on the Kings and probably won't make the playoffs, mostly due to his play of course.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Playoffs. hate on.


How is that an argument here?
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:17 pm to
It's not. Landry is a good player but we have even less offensive potential now and it hasn't really helped the rebounding.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:18 pm to
I'm not taking a side in the Thornton-Landry argument. Just wanted him to explain his argument because Idon't understand how it applies here.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:27 pm to
There's no argument honestly. Just saying we're in the playoffs and the Kings aren't. It is what it is.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

I actually do like Landry and believe the trade was beneficial if we never used Thornton anyway, but stop posting in any thread related to Marcus Thornton b/c you continue to make yourself look foolish with your blind hatred towards him.



I don't hate thornton, never did hate him... stop posting in a thread about the hornets when thornton isn't on the team anymore because you just look foolish...


see how it works?
This post was edited on 3/14/11 at 10:30 pm
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:30 pm to
Which has almost nothing to do with Thornton and Landry's roles on their respective new teams, so I still don't understand why you brought it up.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Which has almost nothing to do with Thornton and Landry's roles on their respective new teams, so I still don't understand why you brought it up.



Thornton's points has nothing to do with THIS team, so I don't understand why he's brought up.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:35 pm to
Well that didn't answer my question at all, but I guess IT JUST IS WHAT IT IS.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23383 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:37 pm to
FWIW, our guards scored a combined 63 points tonight. I don't see why we are talking about Thornton's offense.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15371 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:39 pm to
You got that. I just get tired of the same ol' ya know?
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 10:40 pm to
Well I agree that we don't need guard scoring. I just wanted to know why jay said whatever he did, and he answered by not answering the question.

It is what it is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram