- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Frazier vs Mike Tyson (Who would win?)
Posted on 2/15/11 at 6:04 pm to bomber77
Posted on 2/15/11 at 6:04 pm to bomber77
quote:You guys have Tyson confused with Kimbo Slice.
I don't think he has a signature win in his career.
Tyson was very legit. He started beating lower level opponents, and then gradually upgraded.
He nearly killed Razor Ruddock. . .twice.
He beat Mike Spinks in under 2 minutes. People saying Spinks was not legit are fricking retarded. Just because Tysone fricking destroyed him, does not mean he is less legit. . .it just means that Tyson was THAT MUCH BETTER.
In his Prime, nobody beats Tyson.
Nobody.
I will also point out that I am old enough to have seen Frazier fight. Frazier is the reason I think Ali is a complete sack of pig shite.
I like Frazier, and he would not have been intimidated by Tyson one bit. . .but it wouldn't matter.
Tyson was as strong as anyone, and he was blazing fast.
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 2/15/11 at 7:07 pm to Roaad
quote:
In his Prime, nobody beats Tyson.
bullshite!!! He was great in his PRIME, But WE are talking JOE Frazier!!
Posted on 2/15/11 at 7:11 pm to Roaad
quote:You're seriously trying to sell us Michael fricking Spinks as Tyson's signature win to compare him to Frazier's resume?
He beat Mike Spinks in under 2 minutes. People saying Spinks was not legit are fricking retarded. Just because Tysone fricking destroyed him, does not mean he is less legit. . .it just means that Tyson was THAT MUCH BETTER.
quote:I think there are at least 10 heavyweights who in their primes, would beat Tyson in his prime.
In his Prime, nobody beats Tyson.
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 2/15/11 at 7:26 pm to Roaad
quote:
In his Prime, nobody beats Tyson.
It's exaggerations like these that have caused the backlash against Tyson in regards to his place in boxing history.
I would actually slightly favor Tyson against Frazier. But nobody?
There are lots of bigger heavyweights out there would have given Mike fits:
Foreman
Ali
Vitali
Lennox Lewis (even in Mike's prime)
Holmes (in his prime, not the version Mike fought)
You could make a case for someone like Bowe. Holyfield maybe.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 8:07 pm to Roaad
quote:
People saying Spinks was not legit are fricking retarded
Well, maybe so. But, what he definitely was...a 31 year old who started at light heavyweight.
He had a very good career, but beating him isn't evidence that Tyson would beat a great heavyweight.
He just doesn't factor into the discussion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News