- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dawn of the Dead (2004)
Posted on 12/3/10 at 9:29 pm to shutterspeed
Posted on 12/3/10 at 9:29 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
This movie was terrible and doesn't come close to the original.
Eh, smells like a nerd post.
That had the best cast, best acting, best direction and best production value of any Romero connected Zombie movie by a long shot.
Shaun of the Dead and 28 Days are probably it's only competition for best Zombie movie ever but for different reasons.
1
Posted on 12/4/10 at 10:29 am to Scoop
quote:
Eh, smells like a nerd post.
I wear no Romero-colored glasses. Outside of Night and Dawn, Romero has been a pretty bad filmmaker (and, yes, I have seen the putrid Survival entry).
The fact remains, the original Dawn can't be touched in terms of action, tone, comedy, and satire.
The new Dawn is a sad imitation that uses budget and cast as a way to gloss over its lack of substance and ideas. I've just never understood why people thought this film was so good. And I've seen it several times. Because it's newer and had a higher budget with more contemporary effects?
This post was edited on 12/4/10 at 10:30 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News