Started By
Message

re: Cannon's run question...

Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:36 pm to
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20014 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

He wasn't. You're dealing with a bunch of Dandy Don like old homers in here


The only person who said "Olympic-like numbers" was Antonio Moss.

Cannon ran 100 yards in 9.5 seconds; coverted to 100 meters, it is 10.39.

That's a fact. You make your own judgment.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:38 pm to
10.39 is not setting the world on fire, but it isn't much slower than many skill players in the SEC today.

Also, take into account the better training and workouts these guys today have and Cannon would've been every bit as good as our skill players today.
Posted by cajunjj
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
7427 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:39 pm to
It was measured in yards back then instead of meters. Who gives a shite if u take our words or not. U probably just a thought in your Daddy's mine back then :rimshot:
This post was edited on 11/19/10 at 3:43 pm
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48357 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Cannon ran 100 yards in 9.5 seconds; coverted to 100 meters, it is 10.39.


Someone earlier said that he ran a 9.3 in the 100 yards. That would have been the world record at the time (9.3 became the world record in 1961).

Cannon was obviously superfast, but you have to think that in the age before digital times, he may have gotten a little bump on the hand timed 100s.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram