- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I picked up Reggie Bush
Posted on 11/17/10 at 4:39 pm to MrWiseGuy
Posted on 11/17/10 at 4:39 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Hmm. I thought for sure an NFL head coach would expose him Gameplan to the media.
Since you're going to be a dick I'll respond. I never assumed he would only be in a reduced role nor did I state that. The point I was trying to make was that its a bigger gamble to play reggie bush over Mendenhall. You know Mendenhall is going to get a significant majority of the carries against the 24th ranked rush defense and you don't even know how Bush is going to be used. You stated that Oakland is not a great matchup and you were wrong. They have the best corner in the league which is going to affect the passing game. And please don't think that Jason Campbell or Bruce Gradkowski is going to light up the scoreboard and make Pittsburgh have to pass like Tom Brady did.
quote:
When you look at the players that Bush is competing against, Ivory Jones and Betts. Yes I think Bush has a substantial chance of scoring a TD above any of those guys.
Now throw in Colston, Moore, Meachem, ,Shockey, Campbell, Graham, & Edwards. Compare that to Wallace, Ward, Mendenhall on a team that runs inside the 5. Oh and I know I forgot Heath Miller, he has only 1 TD this season
The only argument you've made is that Pittsburgh likes to "air it out when it starts getting cold." Congratulations on being able to form an opinion. However, it convinces no one.
This post was edited on 11/17/10 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 11/17/10 at 5:23 pm to jm3
quote:
jm3
woooh sahhh. Never once did I say its an absolute definite that Bush should start over Mendenhall.
I simply said theres a legitimate argument. Which I believe there is.
quote:who the F is this ?
Campbell,
quote:who the F is this ?
Edwards
Are you just making up imaginary players as you go along ?
quote:Yet you list Marques Colston and Robert Meachem ? Those guys only have two each. Come on now.
Oh and I know I forgot Heath Miller, he has only 1 TD this season
This post was edited on 11/17/10 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 11/17/10 at 5:30 pm to jm3
quote:
You know Mendenhall is going to get a significant majority of the carries against the 24th ranked rush defense and you don't even know how Bush is going to be used. You stated that Oakland is not a great matchup and you were wrong
Their giving up like 75 yards a game over the last 3 games on the ground. So yeh, I still say its not a great matchup. Oakland is playing some ball right now.
Take out the game where Houston ran for 250 yards and Oakland's been very solid against the run.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)