- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBL: The 2011 Product has Launched
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:21 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:21 pm to Lester Earl
All draft pick trades entered.
How do we want to handle the over/short in number of draft picks? Now that the trades are entered, how about this:
I'll go down the list and in order give the last available pick to the team that got shortchanged
Say a team did a 1 for 0: go back to those same two and give last pick of the guy that's over to the guy that's short
ETA: This is essentially what we did in TDBBL. Any objections?
How do we want to handle the over/short in number of draft picks? Now that the trades are entered, how about this:
I'll go down the list and in order give the last available pick to the team that got shortchanged
Say a team did a 1 for 0: go back to those same two and give last pick of the guy that's over to the guy that's short
ETA: This is essentially what we did in TDBBL. Any objections?
This post was edited on 11/18/10 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:23 pm to reddman
That sounds like a smart person came up with that plan
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:23 pm to reddman
fine with me. Just might want to make sure the other team isnt shortchanged either if u take a pick away from them
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:24 pm to reddman
quote:
Any objections?
Works for me.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:29 pm to EarlyBird
We need a new rule that any trades involving picks need to be pick SWAPS.
This is all fricked up. Gyno has SIX mismatched trades, and it's a fricking mess to try to fix.
This is all fricked up. Gyno has SIX mismatched trades, and it's a fricking mess to try to fix.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:32 pm to reddman
it cant be that bad.
let each manager figure it themselves if its that big of a deal
let each manager figure it themselves if its that big of a deal
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:37 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
it cant be that bad.
Let's just say that somebody is gonna be really happy that it went down like this.
Seriously, in the future, I'd like to require that SWAPS occur. No pick mismatches.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:39 pm to reddman
I have been i trade talks and the other guy refused to send his last pick back...like a fricking tard.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:41 pm to reddman
quote:
Seriously, in the future, I'd like to require that SWAPS occur. No pick mismatches.
each trade is different, should be up to the owners. I dont think that should be a rule
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:42 pm to Lester Earl
God damn TBM are some contrarian fricks.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:42 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
each trade is different, should be up to the owners. I dont think that should be a rule
Then frick it, those picks will just go to waste, and those with less than 16 picks can fight over waiver wire fodder.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:43 pm to Lester Earl
why dont you sent this one out Marle.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:44 pm to reddman
I didn't care about getting picks back at the time of my deals. I was trying to win for the present!
ricky, let me package you an adam jones/brian roberts package for cheap!
anyone interested in a 89 R 39 HR 111 RBI .967 OPS type guy for a pick?
ricky, let me package you an adam jones/brian roberts package for cheap!
anyone interested in a 89 R 39 HR 111 RBI .967 OPS type guy for a pick?
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:46 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
anyone interested in a 89 R 39 HR 111 RBI .967 OPS type guy for a pick?
Damn, that looks fricking enticing without the name Paul Konerko next to it. He fricked killed it last year.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:49 pm to rondo
quote:
God damn TBM are some contrarian fricks.
its easy to say in the offseason that all trades should be even out
think about in-season trading though.
If someone is making enough trades involving high draft picks, then eventually they'll be just giving someone a 10th rd pick for nothing because it happens to be their last pick. That's fricking stupid.
Im not trying to be a contrarian, i just dont think we need to set a stupid rule like this.
In fact I dont even think teams with a shortage of draft picks should be given extras. That is their problem.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:50 pm to reddman
Dude can mash regardless. He's had some BA years. If he goes to a hitters park, look out.
He's got 365 career HR, 2 40+ HR season, 4 30+ HR seasons, 7 20+HR seasons, and plays 150+ games a year. Not to mention a career OPS of 855.
Could be a good power piece on a shitty team. Rick gave him to me for a 3rd, but wouldn't trade me Aubrey Huff for a 3rd
He's got 365 career HR, 2 40+ HR season, 4 30+ HR seasons, 7 20+HR seasons, and plays 150+ games a year. Not to mention a career OPS of 855.
Could be a good power piece on a shitty team. Rick gave him to me for a 3rd, but wouldn't trade me Aubrey Huff for a 3rd
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:50 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
In fact I dont even think teams with a shortage of draft picks should be given extras. That is their problem.
LE has spoken. The picks will stay the way that they are.
Gyno just lost a chance to get a 9th and a 10th rounder added to his draft.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:51 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Dude can mash regardless. He's had some BA years. If he goes to a hitters park, look out.
He's got 365 career HR, 2 40+ HR season, 4 30+ HR seasons, 7 20+HR seasons, and plays 150+ games a year. Not to mention a career OPS of 855.
I don't need a 1B though. I have three keepers already with 1B eligibility.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:53 pm to reddman
quote:
Gyno just lost a chance to get a 9th and a 10th rounder added to his draft.
Oh well, that sucks.
Ian, you're a crybaby pussy
quote:
I don't need a 1B though. I have three keepers already with 1B eligibility.
I was just selling him, not to you necessarily.
This post was edited on 11/18/10 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 11/18/10 at 4:55 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
I was just selling him, not to you necessarily.
Popular
Back to top



3




