Started By
Message

re: To all Oregon lovers - 2 wins against winning record teams?

Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by MN Tigah
Hastings, MN
Member since Mar 2008
535 posts
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.


Your argument pisses me off! You have the opinion that UO would run all over LSU, and it seems to be based on the fact that Cam Newton seemed unstoppable against the Tigers. Your opinion that Stanford is equal to LSU is flamitory, as well. Did you notice that LSU never blitzed Newton? Do you know why not? My belief is that LSU defense did not blitz against Newton because his passing numbers were so good against the blitz before that game. Personally, I feel like LSU should have called a few blitzes in the second half, but that's just my opinion. I would have liked to see Newton suffer a few of the hits that our QBs suffered. Anyway, I digressed....UO has not faced a defense anywhere near as good as LSUs, nor has Stanford. This Tiger offense is developing, and it has plenty of depth. Our defense is deep, as well. No way Stanford has that depth. They were the dregs of the Pac 10 just a couple of years back. The friggin Pac 10 has 4 decent teams, count'em 4. The SEC West has 5 in the top 20!!

Stanford, my arse! LSU would give UO all they wanted, and more. That's my opinion!

Geaux Tigers.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204155 posts
Posted on 11/9/10 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Your argument pisses me off! You have the opinion that UO would run all over LSU


I think they would. They score in bunches.



quote:

and it seems to be based on the fact that Cam Newton seemed unstoppable against the Tigers.



He pretty much was.



quote:

Your opinion that Stanford is equal to LSU is flamitory, as well


WHY???



quote:

My belief is that LSU defense did not blitz against Newton because his passing numbers were so good against the blitz before that game. Personally, I feel like LSU should have called a few blitzes in the second half, but that's just my opinion




Luck has some great #'s as well.



quote:

but that's just my opinion




Doesn't mean its right.




quote:

UO has not faced a defense anywhere near as good as LSUs, nor has Stanford


I will agree here. BUT LSU has not faced an OFFENSE as good as Oregon's. But go ahead.



quote:

This Tiger offense is developing, and it has plenty of depth



Based o ONE half against Bama???????? WOW!!!!



quote:

No way Stanford has that depth. They were the dregs of the Pac 10 just a couple of years back.



Are they now????



quote:

Stanford, my arse! LSU would give UO all they wanted, and more



I would hope LSAU would beat a OREGON or Stanford. BUT.............



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram