Started By
Message

re: Mediocre is 2 - 9 versus ranked teams over the last 2.5+ seasons

Posted on 10/28/10 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262622 posts
Posted on 10/28/10 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

2005: 40th (according to Rivals)
2006: 8th
2007: 8th
2008: 2nd
2009: 21st


Pretty damn solid. You would expect a team with this level of raw talent to do better than ND did under Weiss.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 10/28/10 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

Pretty damn solid. You would expect a team with this level of raw talent to do better than ND did under Weiss.



Recruiting rankings probably wasn't the best way to describe it, and that's my fault.

But who recruits good classes and fails?

You know why we've failed the last 2 years? Because our senior leadership came from shite classes in 2005 and 2006.
Because talent wasn't there at key positions.

It doesn't matter how genius your coach is, he's not going to make a monster out of mediocre talent, especially going against some of the most talented teams in the country.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram