- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Too many chiefs? Miami Heat
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:18 pm
That describes the Miami Heat.
I hope they don't win a single title.
I will be pulling against them all year.
I hope they don't win a single title.
I will be pulling against them all year.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:21 pm to headboard banger
cool dude. I'll be cheering for them all year.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:22 pm to headboard banger
Yup, this needed it's own thread.
But no they don't have to many chiefs. Lebron has always been a pass first player and Bosh isn't a leader either. Lebron may be the best player on the team but it's still Wade's team.
But no they don't have to many chiefs. Lebron has always been a pass first player and Bosh isn't a leader either. Lebron may be the best player on the team but it's still Wade's team.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:23 pm to headboard banger
quote:
Too many chiefs? Miami Heat
That describes the Miami Heat
I think it has more to do with them playing there 1st game together, on the road, against a really good team.
Not to mention an obviously rusty Wade. Wade and Bosh combined to shoot like 25% or something and they were STILL only down 3 with a minute to play.
Everyone thinking they learned so much about the Heat tonight in ONE game, there first of the year, are completely going overboard.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:28 pm to shel311
quote:
I think it has more to do with them playing there 1st game together, on the road, against a really good team.
Not to mention an obviously rusty Wade. Wade and Bosh combined to shoot like 25% or something and they were STILL only down 3 with a minute to play.
Everyone thinking they learned so much about the Heat tonight in ONE game, there first of the year, are completely going overboard.
Thank you!!!Somebody that knows basketball. You just can't throw a team together and expect them to dominate right off the bat. Take the 2004 USA men's team.
This post was edited on 10/26/10 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:29 pm to bayou2003
quote:
Thank you!!!Somebody that knows basketball.
Man, for a supposed Lebron homer, i'm gettin all kinds of love tonight.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:30 pm to shel311
quote:
Everyone thinking they learned so much about the Heat tonight in ONE game, there first of the year, are completely going overboard.
I think the one thing people learned/should have already known,is that they are going to struggle with teams that have size like the C's.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:33 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
I think the one thing people learned/should have already known,is that they are going to struggle with teams that have size like the C's.
While your point is correct, that didn't really play out tonight.
When you go through the list of why the Heat lost, the size is pretty far down on the list.
Celtics had 3 more rebounds, and didn't really dominate down low.
It was just a bad shooting night for Bosh/Wade coupled with the usual Celtics really good defense.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:35 pm to shel311
quote:
Celtics had 3 more rebounds, and didn't really dominate down low.
I'm not sure how it finished at the end, but at half Celtics had 12 points in the paint, C's had 26.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:36 pm to tigerguy121
i love jumping to conclusions one game into a season
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:37 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
I'm not sure how it finished at the end, but at half Celtics had 12 points in the paint, C's had 26
I assume you mean Heat 12, Cs 26.
Fair point.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:37 pm to Selenai
quote:
i love jumping to conclusions one game into a season
Isn't it awesome?
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:56 pm to headboard banger
Posted on 10/26/10 at 10:58 pm to Woopigsooie20
This post was edited on 10/26/10 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 10/26/10 at 11:00 pm to Woopigsooie20
I think the polarizing reaction to the Heat was expected.
They're the Superteam...getting lots of hype coming in, and since nothing like this has ever happened, nobody really knew what to expect.
Basically, it has already become trendy for people to hope that they lose, (2007 Patriots ring a bell?)
I think they showed some glaring issues tonight, but I definitely don't think they're in trouble. Just takes time to gel and figure out what works best.
However, they're not going 73-9, and they're not winning the title, IMO. Not yet.
They're the Superteam...getting lots of hype coming in, and since nothing like this has ever happened, nobody really knew what to expect.
Basically, it has already become trendy for people to hope that they lose, (2007 Patriots ring a bell?)
I think they showed some glaring issues tonight, but I definitely don't think they're in trouble. Just takes time to gel and figure out what works best.
However, they're not going 73-9, and they're not winning the title, IMO. Not yet.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 11:04 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
They're the Superteam...getting lots of hype coming in
I understand, but the Celtics are still #2 in the power rankings and for crying out loud, look who they have...
-Paul Pierce
-Ray Allen
-Kevin Garnett
-Shaq
-Rondo
-Glen Davis
-Kendrick Perkins
That's a freaking Superteam if any...
Posted on 10/26/10 at 11:09 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
I understand, but the Celtics are still #2 in the power rankings and for crying out loud, look who they have...
Exactly!!!
Which is why it is ridiculous that everyone is reading so much into this game.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 11:12 pm to shel311
quote:
Which is why it is ridiculous that everyone is reading so much into this game.
A little to be expected though when you had people forecasting whether or not they would top 70 wins.
Posted on 10/26/10 at 11:14 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
A little to be expected though when you had people forecasting whether or not they would top 70 wins
True, but that was a very small contingent of people, I think.
And most of those saying that are probably the MSB posters we never take seriously any way.
Popular
Back to top
4






