re: Getting What You Need

How the hell does Nebraska and notre dame have built in recruiting? Do they reside in states that produce the kind of players LA does? Hell no, they require national recruiting to compete, totally different ballgame.

And you idiots keep bringing up coker and UM, do you realize you are making peoples points for them? Miles is doing to us exactly what coker did to UM. He is recruiting for stars and not addressing needs just like coker, granted not nearly as much but still doing it with the most important position on the field. It will end the same way and lsu will be trying to dig itself put of a hole just like UM. And lsu has so many advantages over um its not even funny. Um has terrible facilities and pretty much just has location and former players going for it.

I dunno if les should be fired this year but he will not get a big time oc. Not saying he won't get a good one just not big time at the time of the hire. If he doesn't get the juco kid from GA then our program is gonna hurt for a while unless he can get a true freshman phenom to come.

I do know one thing though, LSU deserves better for the money they are spending. Simple as that.

quote:

---

I love how people think what happened to nebraska, miami, and notre dame (as was pointed out earlier in the thread) could not happen at LSU. why would we be immune to that? built in recruiting you say? those 3 have it as well. they are also still more of a premier HC gig than LSU.

---

So, we could be 8-4 or 9-3 with Les Miles, or we could be 7-5 or 8-4 with a new head coach minus all the idiocy and embarrassment that Les brings to the program....what's the downside again?