no, not unless it's completely scripted, and mixes up strategy. I certainly don't want a repeat of 04 with either QB afraid to make a little slip-up.

With that said, what could be done is the following...

1. Run mostly traditional play-action, pro-style offense with either Lee or JJ
2. Dump the 5 wide stuff...neither QB has ever had any success here
3. If you want to include some option / zone read stuff, let Shepard or Ware run it

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by dgnx6

Baton Rouge

Member since Feb 2006

69365 posts

Posted on 9/13/10 at 8:08 am to ForeLSU

This is what pisses me off. If they are going to run the option, why not use shep or ware as the qb?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by bigjuice56

Ponchatoula, LA

Member since Mar 2009

1131 posts

Posted on 9/13/10 at 8:11 am to ForeLSU

quote:
With that said, what could be done is the following...

1. Run mostly traditional play-action, pro-style offense with either Lee or JJ
2. Dump the 5 wide stuff...neither QB has ever had any success here
3. If you want to include some option / zone read stuff, let Shepard or Ware run it

+1

Florida '06. Leak was the QB, but they had the package of plays for Tebow. Worked out pretty well for them. Imagine Shepard at QB if the defense actually had to respect the threat of a pass.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by SouthernMan

Charlotte

Member since Nov 2008

1380 posts

Posted on 9/13/10 at 8:14 am to ForeLSU

quote:
With that said, what could be done is the following...

1. Run mostly traditional play-action, pro-style offense with either Lee or JJ
2. Dump the 5 wide stuff...neither QB has ever had any success here
3. If you want to include some option / zone read stuff, let Shepard or Ware run it

I buy this

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board