- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "A team improves the most between game 1 and game 2"
Posted on 9/12/10 at 11:52 am to LSUMafia
Posted on 9/12/10 at 11:52 am to LSUMafia
DL was damn good against UNC and were dominant against Vandy. They just didn't have a whole lot of room to improve.
If you tards would think for a moment you would realize that giving them a B is actually a great thing - it means they have been playing at a high level through both games.
I guess it's too much to ask this next generation to actually think. OFW.
If you tards would think for a moment you would realize that giving them a B is actually a great thing - it means they have been playing at a high level through both games.
I guess it's too much to ask this next generation to actually think. OFW.
Posted on 9/12/10 at 11:59 am to 1p56
Ummm...Our DL missed tons of tackles against UNC, and obviously you ignored most of that game and just went by the sack numbers several of which came from the DBs.
Our DL played well in game 1, but at best a B. They completely dominated in Game 2 which would make their improvement that much BIGGER. Our DBs didn't have to basically do shite last night.
Our DL played well in game 1, but at best a B. They completely dominated in Game 2 which would make their improvement that much BIGGER. Our DBs didn't have to basically do shite last night.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)