- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/15/10 at 8:25 pm to Geauxtiga
quote:
No, it wasn't really.
The difference though was that Bama came off of 2 consecutive bowl appearances. LSU came off of 2 consecutive losing seasons. Saban had work to do in both places, but expectations were somewhat different in both programs at the times he first went to both.
This post was edited on 7/15/10 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 7/15/10 at 8:26 pm to Geauxtiga
quote:
No, it wasn't really.
You sound like a closet Bama Boy
Posted on 7/16/10 at 11:09 am to Geauxtiga
quote:
Bama's program was in better shape than LSU's when he arrived at each school.
No, it wasn't really.
Ridiculous. Bama was by no stretch an elite powerhouse when Saban took over, but to compare them to eight losing seasons in 11 years, back to back 4-7 and 3-8 seasons, 12 years removed from the last SEC title, 14 years removed from the last major bowl appearance, outrageous rates of attrition and by far the worst period in our history is just silly.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)