Started By
Message
locked post

How accurate are the FIFA World Rankings

Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:35 pm
Posted by zmonbobbo
Ruston
Member since Aug 2007
446 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:35 pm
In regards to what team is better overall? How are the points determined? Is it by vote or some sort of scoring system? And with the US 14th and Ghana 32nd, would that make us relatively heavy favorites for this game?

Sorry, I'm new to this whole thing. Just hopin' the US can win a few more.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:36 pm to
They will be the fan favorite. Thats for sure. Being the last team left from Africa.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18937 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:38 pm to
The ranking are incredibly abstract. I wouldnt count on them.
Posted by Tubedog13
Member since May 2009
3510 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:39 pm to
I was wondering that myself. From the play of France, Italy, England, etc. they don't seem too accurate. It seems like they are based off of name recognition only.
Posted by lsugorilla
PNW
Member since Sep 2009
5603 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:39 pm to
not accurate, france is #9 and went out flaming.
russia #11 is not in it
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101940 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

How accurate are the FIFA World Rankings
In regards to what team is better overall?

Not very. I wouldn't be surprised if we are considered a slight underdog.
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
19942 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 3:54 pm to
egypt who we beat 3-0 and didnt even qualify, is ahead of us
(last time i checked)
those rankings are bogus
Posted by TFS4E
Washington DC
Member since Nov 2008
13461 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 8:47 pm to
They aren't very accurate, but the thing to remember is that anyone can win on any given day. If you make the world cup you are a good team, no matter your ranking. Some teams may shite the bed (France cough), but they are all good teams. I can't help but think outside of the top 3 you could rank the teams just about anywhere.

ETA: but even the top 3 lose to "lesser" teams: Spain for example.
This post was edited on 6/23/10 at 8:48 pm
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 9:15 pm to
If I remember correctly, its simply a point system based on the matches (competitive or exhibition) that a national side plays against international competition. Some national teams play more exhibitions/warmups/qualifiers than others, and this leads to inaccurate rankings.

In the end, Ghana is a very good team. It took Germany getting an amazing shot to beat them despite them being without their best player in Essien this entire tournament. It will be a tough game, but to answer your question, Ghana did not play alot of exhibition games, thus their lower ranking. They were one of the top 2 African countries the past 4 years with a healthy Essien.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 6/23/10 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

How accurate are the FIFA World Rankings
In regards to what team is better overall? How are the points determined?


Here is a link to the formula used for the rankings:

LINK
This post was edited on 6/23/10 at 11:11 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69412 posts
Posted on 6/24/10 at 4:10 am to
just look it up on fifa. They are pretty accurate. We played in the confeds cuup though. That helped us out a lot. You get points for all kinds of things.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram