Started By
Message
locked post

If we just get A$M, that makes 13...how does this work

Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:43 pm
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56177 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:43 pm
from a schedule standpoint?

I assume they will still play UT every year...

That is going to be a brutal schedule for A$M every year IMO.

Either way, the SEC is getting tougher...that puts more pressure on the coaches..
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
20618 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:44 pm to
adding Wake Forest in the east. didn't you get the memo?
Posted by olmec26
NOLA/BR
Member since Jan 2008
868 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:45 pm to
Nah, we add VT.
Posted by PokerChamp21
Member since Apr 2006
20125 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:46 pm to
nah we add UNC
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56177 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:49 pm to
It has been reported that slive would be content with 13
Posted by Papa Purple and Gold
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
11197 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:54 pm to
my guess would be west would have 7 teams with a&m and east 6

but they'll shoot for an even number obviously
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 10:55 pm
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:55 pm to
nah, we add Florida State in the East to balance A&M in the West.
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

It has been reported that slive would be content with 13


That would be unlucky though.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 12:27 am to
I don't think we add Florida State unless the SEC wanted to be a 16 team conference. I think the SEC would look for a school in a state where there is no SEC school obviously like the state of Texas. Virginia Tech, North Carolina, something like that for the east. Florida St, Miami, Georgia Tech, Clemson, those are good schools out east but I just don't think the SEC would want to go after a school where we already have programs in those states. I think for ESPN/CBS TV money and recruiting purposes that the SEC targets areas where we have no schools already in those states.
Posted by Boobie Miles
Knoxville, TN
Member since Jun 2010
305 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 12:32 am to
Maybe we just kick out Miss State.

Or replace them with Memphis... they are just as competitive and come with $10 mil a year
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 5:38 am to
quote:

Maybe we just kick out Miss State.


Best option IMO.
Posted by Dr Drunkenstein
Washington DC
Member since May 2009
2918 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:10 am to
quote:

I assume they will still play UT every year...


No, that rivalry is dead, after 100+ years.....

A&m had given their word, their 100% commitment, that they would move to the PAC 16 with TX, OU, Okie State, Tx Tech and Colorado. When A&M called to say they were breaking their commitment, they were told that none of those 5 former Big 12 schools would ever schedule them again in any sports unless they honored their word. A&M still picked the SEC.

This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 7:10 am
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:17 am to
With Texas doing everything they can to position their schedule for the easiest pathway to the BCSCG I see the Texas/Texas A&M game as a good thing for A&M. In a few years when they have the Texas H.S. talent pipeline in place to the SEC they will love having Texas to beat up on their way to challenging for the SECCG and BCSCG. I can't wait to see those images of Longhorn Fans crying as the Aggies Chant SEC.
Posted by lsutigerbrian
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
2630 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:17 am to
God you are some whiney bitches. I don't know what y'all are going to do without having aTm around. You won't be able to say things are "aggie" anymore. The rivalry will resume in a couple years after you quit being a bunch of pussies about A&M picking a real conference instead of an easy out with 2 auto bids and no championship game.
Posted by Boobie Miles
Knoxville, TN
Member since Jun 2010
305 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:18 am to
No, that rivalry is dead, after 100+ years.....

A&m had given their word, their 100% commitment, that they would move to the PAC 16 with TX, OU, Okie State, Tx Tech and Colorado. When A&M called to say they were breaking their commitment, they were told that none of those 5 former Big 12 schools would ever schedule them again in any sports unless they honored their word. A&M still picked the SEC.


Go cry

Everyone knows they are still going to play. A&M is just calling Texas's bluff
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Either way, the SEC is getting tougher
Not sure about that. Over the last decade, A&M is 63-59 (36-46 in the Big 12). We're basically talking about another Ole Miss.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:29 am to
My opinion: no divisions.

Four permanent rivals
Four rotating games
Top two duke it out in Atlanta

I don't think we even need divisions right now.

Alabama - AU GA MSU TN
Arkansas - LSU OM A&M TN
Auburn - AL FL GA SC
Florida - AU GA KY SC
Georgia - AL AU FL SC
Kentucky - FL TN A&M VU
Louisiana State - AR OM MSU A&M
Mississippi - AR LSU MSU VU
Mississippi State - AL LSU OM A&M
South Carolina - AU FL GA VU
Tennessee - AL AR KY VU
Texas A&M - AR KY LSU MSU
Vanderbilt - KY OM SC TN

or

Alabama AU TN MSU GA
Arkansas A&M SC LSU OM
Auburn AL GA FL MSU
Florida GA AU KY TN
Georgia FL AU SC AL
Kentucky TN VU FL A&M
Louisiana State AR MSU OM A&M
Mississippi AR MSU LSU VU
Mississippi State OM LSU AL AU
South Carolina AR A&M GA VU
Tennessee KY VU AL FL
Texas A&M AR SC LSU KY
Vanderbilt TN KY OM SC
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 7:47 am
Posted by Wildcat
Kentucky
Member since Sep 2007
5771 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:32 am to
SEC will not leave it at 13, I look for VT to join no later than next week.
Posted by G4LSU
Member since Jan 2009
2445 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:33 am to
not going to stop at 13.

quote:

My opinion: no divisions.
Four permanent rivals
Four rotating games
Top two duke it out in Atlanta


lots of coin flipping for the 4 tied teams who didn't play each other.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 8:06 am to
quote:

lots of coin flipping for the 4 tied teams who didn't play each other.
None in 18 years, though. If the SEC had no divisions after expansion, only three times would a tie-breaker have been used at all, and head-to-head would have solved them all.

1992 - Alabama 8-0, Florida 6-2, Georgia 6-2. Head to head - Florida.
1993 - Auburn 8-0 (ineligible), Florida 7-1, Tennessee 6-1-1, Alabama 5-2-1
1994 - Alabama 8-0, Florida 7-1
1995 - Florida 8-0, Tennessee 7-1, Arkansas 6-2
1996 - Florida 8-0, Tennessee 7-1, Alabama 6-2, LSU 6-2
1997 - Tennessee 7-1, Florida 6-2, Georgia 6-2, LSU 6-2, Auburn 6-2. Head-to-head: AU 2-1, UGA 1-1, LSU 1-1, UF 1-2; Auburn wins tie-breaker.
1998 - Tennessee 8-0, Florida 7-1, Georgia 6-2, Arkansas 6-2, Mississippi State 6-2
1999 - Alabama 7-1, Florida 7-1
2000 - Florida 7-1, Auburn 6-2
2001 - Tennessee 7-1, Florida 6-2, LSU 5-3, South Carolina 5-3, Georgia 5-3, Auburn 5-3
2002 - Georgia 7-1, Alabama 6-2 (ineligible), Florida 6-2, Auburn 5-3, LSU 5-3, Tennessee 5-3, Arkansas 5-3
2003 - LSU 7-1, Ole Miss 7-1, Tennessee 6-2, Florida 6-2, Georgia 6-2
2004 - Auburn 8-0, Tennessee 7-1
2005 - LSU 7-1, Auburn 7-1, Georgia 6-2
2006 - Florida 7-1, Arkansas 7-1
2007 - LSU 7-1, Georgia 6-2, Tennessee 6-2. Head to head: Tennessee.
2008 - Alabama 8-0, Florida 7-1
2009 - Alabama 8-0, Florida 8-0
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 8:08 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram