- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What is the difference in BIG12/SEC academi standards for athletes
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:11 pm
Can't find a clear answer. From what I understood, it was harder for an athlete to qualify for an SEC sport than a BIG12 sport.
NOTE: I understand that UT is a great institution. Much better than almost all SEC schools (academically speaking). But, why does that matter for athletics? Don't we have a higher academic qualification standard than the BIG12? I know a number of recruits who couldn't get into SEC schools had to go to the BIG12 for these reasons.
Maybe this is wrong. I've tried to do some research but it's convoluted bs. maybe someone can clear things up.
NOTE: I understand that UT is a great institution. Much better than almost all SEC schools (academically speaking). But, why does that matter for athletics? Don't we have a higher academic qualification standard than the BIG12? I know a number of recruits who couldn't get into SEC schools had to go to the BIG12 for these reasons.
Maybe this is wrong. I've tried to do some research but it's convoluted bs. maybe someone can clear things up.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:11 pm to Duckie
the SEC requires an additional math or something
see: phil loadholt
see: phil loadholt
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
That's about all I could find too. And some other crap about non qualifiers.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:21 pm to Duckie
quote:
And some other crap about non qualifiers
I read something that the Big 12 was only allowed 4 partial qualifiers in a year, 2 men and 2 women. And only one per sport. And no non-qualifiers.
I had to find out just what that meant, though. Apparently, if an athlete has either a substandard GPA or SAT/ACT score, he's a partial qualifier. If he's substandard in both, he's a non-qualifier.
There's probably other ways to get around it, though, and the amount of effort schools put into it would be directly proportional to the athletic ability of the individual. A five-star prospect would get a lot of attention. A two star, something less.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 2:26 pm to Carlos Santannaclaus
quote:
There's probably other ways to get around it, though, and the amount of effort schools put into it would be directly proportional to the athletic ability of the individual. A five-star prospect would get a lot of attention. A two star, something less.
I need to find some pictures of UT's Dumb U Bldg they recently opened for their athletes. Very impressive and very much needed. The ones I saw were of the "tutoring center" where the athletes get the extra academic attention. It looks like they were reading "See Spot, see Spot run" in the photo
ETA: UT Rocket Scientist is suspect in bar fight
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 2:29 pm
Popular
Back to top

1






