What network is going to pay for this new PacTeen TV deal?

VERSUS!!!!!!

FOX won't have the BCS anymore

Dont they have all of hockey?

quote:

---

i just dont see Fox paying that much for west coast CFB rights..

---

Fox is already on board and giving Larry Scott estimates so he can attract the new teams.

Fox Cable Networks for starters. On top of that, they'll have ESPN and the broadcast networks so the pile of money is quite large

quote:

---

i dont mean the Fox regionals.. i mean Fox the network..

---

I know, it's the Fox national network.

LINK

quote:

---

The thought is the Big 16 (or whatever they decide for the name) would start its own television network that could command premium subscriber dollars from cable providers on par with the Big Ten Network and pay out upwards of $20 million to each of the 16 schools in TV revenue.

Such a merger between the six Big 12 schools and the Pac-10 would build a conference with seven of the country's top 20 TV markets (Los Angeles, Dallas, San Francisco, Houston, Phoenix, Seattle and Sacramento). And such a league would likely command attention from every cable system in the country and command a premium rate from every cable system west of the Mississippi.

Those projected TV revenues would double the current payouts of roughly $9 million to Big 12 and Pac-10 members. If the Big 16 reached its projections, the league would also surpass the SEC's projected payout of $17 million per school reached in a 15-year TV deal with ABC/ESPN and CBS signed in 2008.

According to the Omaha World-Herald, the TV revenues paid out to the Big 12 in 2007 (the last year revenue was made public) were as follows:

1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million

AN OFFER THAT CAN'T BE REFUSED?

An invitation from the Pac-10 will be hard for the six Big 12 schools being targeted not to consider. Why? Because Fox Cable Networks (a division of News Corporation), which serves as the chief operating partner of the successful Big Ten Network, appears ready to make the Big 16 Network happen.

Fox is the chief television partner of the Pac-10 currently, and its subsidiary Fox Sports Net currently holds the rights to the Big 12 cable package, which comes up for bid in the spring of 2011. The Pac-10 also has television deals with Fox up for re-bid at the same time.

The Big Ten has shown the conference network model works. According to published reports, the TV revenue paid out to Big Ten schools jumped from $14 million for the fiscal year 2006-07 to $22 million for the fiscal year 2007-08.

---

quote:

---

Scott is targeting television markets, not necessarily good football teams. Though there certainly are some good teams in the new venture. He is counting heavily on Texas and OU, along with the new Texas Markets and Denver saving the arse of the West Coast teams with a new TV deal.

---

Exactly. They'll have 7 of the top 20 markets...15% of the entire nation.

I'm sure they want to start their own network.

If Fox is behind the $$$, you can bet Texas has an in hand guarantee that they could make more than the B10 would pay out, and the B10 member institutions get in the 20m range. Texas is following the money. Has nothing to do with competition, academics....its money

quote:

---

Get your head out of your arse. Those networks televise OTHER GAMES. Also, learn what Broadcast Rights mean.

---

GFY doucherocket. I am well aware of what broadcast rights mean you cocksucking shite.

You come on these boards talking to everyone like you are the end all be all of knowledge, yet in truth are nothing but a fricking twit behind a keyboard who lives and dies by google. Go diaf you pos. You add nothing to topics.