Started By
Message

re: Who Dat "Nation"

Posted on 2/5/10 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by 40 Rouge
Red Stick
Member since Feb 2009
2696 posts
Posted on 2/5/10 at 11:15 pm to
I get where you're coming from Me, I really do, but I respectfully disagree with your stance.

The Saints have been in the spotlight since Katrina, and with our recent success I would think that the Saints have more and more people rooting for them. Some media outlets have called the Saints the new "America's team", so I think Who Dat Nation is appropriate now.
Posted by Me
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2003
4827 posts
Posted on 2/5/10 at 11:17 pm to
Well thank you for sensibly and maturely stating your opnion as opposed to most of the others on this discussion board.
Posted by flybynight
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
811 posts
Posted on 2/5/10 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

I don't think "Who Dat" is a rip off of the Bengals but this whole "nation" thing is taken from teams that have used it long before.


You idiot, do you really believe that there are many things (if any) that are completely original? Of course teams have used it before....and I'll bet good money that if we trace it back far enough, it was used before the "original" original.

I do believe you need a good smelling salt of some sort.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram