- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WRs...Fobbs, Boone, Thomas?
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:02 pm
Would we take all three? If only two, would it be Boone over Thomas or the other way around with the seemingly renewed focus on Louisiana?
3
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:02 pm to MOT
Thomas still doesn't have any offers. From anyone.
His teammate Bridgewater just committed to Henderson State. No D1A offers for him either.
Strange.
His teammate Bridgewater just committed to Henderson State. No D1A offers for him either.
Strange.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:03 pm to MOT
Thomas will get an offer if we don't get Fobbs, Reed, or Boone. I would rather only take one of them and not waste a scholarship on Thomas
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:06 pm to GeauxAggie972
You don't think we'll take more than one?
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:14 pm to MOT
quote:
You don't think we'll take more than one?
I think we will and I think between Reed, Fobbs, and Boone, we will get two. I was saying I wouldn't take Thomas just because we said we were gonna take 2. It would be better to use it somewhere else on someone who will actually contribute or just hold it into next year
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:16 pm to GeauxAggie972
I think we land Boone and Fobbs.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:33 pm to GeauxAggie972
I think it is an interesting scenario. Boone is obviously more highly thought of, has better speed, and looks to be better after the catch. Thomas runs good routes, has good hands, and looks bigger. Both play for good high school programs. Gonzales has a connection to Boone's school and they produce players regularly. Thomas (and Jackson) could maybe help with Rasco.
I think I would probably take Boone, but I could also see Thomas playing a role and offering other advangates.
I think I would probably take Boone, but I could also see Thomas playing a role and offering other advangates.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:36 pm to MOT
So, what happens if none of the guys left on our priority list decides to come to LSU? Do we save our scholarships or waste them on 3 star guys who are trying to decide between Vandy and Troy? I say save them rather than waste them on some crap.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:38 pm to MOT
We aren't seriously going to offer a guy who has no DIA offers a week from NSD, are we?
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:40 pm to thunderbird1100
I don't think Thomas will have any influence on Rasco. If bringing in Jackson and doing what we can does not bring in Rasco than nothing will. I have to think 2 of Reed, Fobbs, and Boone will be here.
Which is very nice to have Fobbs and Boone this year, and already have a great start on Landry and Alonzo Lewis next year
Which is very nice to have Fobbs and Boone this year, and already have a great start on Landry and Alonzo Lewis next year
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:49 pm to PinevilleTiger
I would guess if someone on the priority list decides not to come here you wouldn't jump directly to crap, you would go to the next name on the list. It isn't like we're talking about taking a 5'6 140 pound receiver from False River. We also need numbers at the position, not sure how many you could afford to carry over there.
Toliver - Sr
Williams - Jr (not likely to contribute)
Randle - Soph
Taylor - Soph
Tolliver - Soph
Wright - Fr
That is all we have, not including walkons.
Toliver - Sr
Williams - Jr (not likely to contribute)
Randle - Soph
Taylor - Soph
Tolliver - Soph
Wright - Fr
That is all we have, not including walkons.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:52 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
We aren't seriously going to offer a guy who has no DIA offers a week from NSD, are we?
I don't know. I'm assuming there is some kind of scenario that could lead to it since they are bringing him in for a visit.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:53 pm to MOT
quote:
That is all we have, not including walkons.
If we can only sign1 or 0 more WRs this class look for Tharold Simon to make the move to WR.
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:54 pm to MOT
I think if we get Boone, we can start him in the slot from day one. Add in Fobbs or Reed and we have a solid class. We were only planning on taking 2 WRs this year and with Davis and Hunter leaving, we are now going to our 2nd tier of receivers.
Also, we basically have two commits next year already in Landry and Lewis
Also, we basically have two commits next year already in Landry and Lewis
Posted on 1/27/10 at 10:57 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Tharold Simon
I would agree with the move and I think he may be the best player in this class, but does he have even the slightest chance to get eligible? A poster from Eunice on another board says it isn't close.
Posted on 1/28/10 at 8:09 am to truthbetold
quote:Strange? How about that kid from Redemptorist named Deuce Coon?
Thomas still doesn't have any offers. From anyone
Posted on 1/28/10 at 8:25 am to Rockerbraves
If you read this Shreveport Times article, you would get the impression that he (Eric Thomas) is partial to Arkansas. I do feel comfortable that we will get some combination of two receivers. Just not sure who it will be. If I had to guess, it sounds like Boone and Fobbs.
This post was edited on 1/28/10 at 8:30 am
Posted on 1/28/10 at 10:15 am to duboisd
Boone is staying with Tech.
Posted on 1/28/10 at 10:53 am to ynnhoj316
Is he really?? That's surprising to me.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News