Started By
Message

re: 3rd and Chavis?

Posted on 12/11/09 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76580 posts
Posted on 12/11/09 at 2:53 pm to
Yup. I dont know if I've ever seen a defense so unimpressive to look at and that gave up so much yardage and yet kept teams out of the end zone so well.
Posted by LATIGERFAN
Member since Sep 2009
1317 posts
Posted on 12/11/09 at 2:56 pm to
There is no doubt that LSU gives up yards, but not points but if the offense could move the ball consistently (a good running game would help), the defenses numbers would look much better.
Posted by EricB
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1680 posts
Posted on 12/11/09 at 2:56 pm to
I think it's basically a 4-2-5 which we did very well with. It doesn't look like a 4-2-5 because the ss/lbs were never centered, but looking at the blitz packages thats what I think it is.

I think with a more dominant defensive line (hopefully in the future) it will be even more effective if our ends and dt's require double team blocking.

Its also good because if the O coordinator is smarter than you, you still stand a good chance of stopping him because you don't have to guess what he's doing as accurately. If he doesn't pick plays in anticipation of your blitz / zone packages he's gonna have problems, unless ofcourse, his qb is a stud, or if he has a RB that can stick it in your gut.
This post was edited on 12/11/09 at 2:58 pm
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32455 posts
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Yup. I dont know if I've ever seen a defense so unimpressive to look at and that gave up so much yardage and yet kept teams out of the end zone so well.
3rd and Chavis needs to be changed to "between the 20's".
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram