re: When will JJ be accepted by our fans?

Let's get mature and get off the racial issue?

Since my last post didn't come out well through the copy and past method; here are a couple of glaring facts. These are numbers when they both played, whether starting or just in action during a game since they have been here.

JJ (Interceptions = 7) (Sacks = 39) Total = 46

JL (Intercpetions = 17) Sacks = 11) Total = 28


JJ - was 205 for 345 = 59.4% Total Yds, = 2393 & 11.6 YPR
JL - was 159 for 309 = 51.4% Total Yds. = 2070 & 13.0 YPR

YPR is Yards Per Reception. *Next is Rushing Yards for careers.

JJ - 153 Carries for 294 Yds, = Avg. Yd, P/C is +1.92
JL - 14 Carries for -120 Yds = Avg. Yd. P/C is -8.6

I hope this clears up some of this stupid argument?

Now, the intangibles are not factored in! 1. Babying the QB;
2. Treating the QB like he is accountable for his actions.

If you have been around sports long enough, these two things happen when coaches cannot admit their action plan are or held accountable for their actions. Thus they make a change. Remember against Ar Kansas last season, JJ only completed approx. 49.5% of his passes in his first action. The Off. went to a more mobile QB and this helped JJ then and thus there was a substantial gain in his production in the Bowl Game against GA Tech. Also, the Defense probably played their best game of that season as well.

And did any of you get the point that the Off. that JL played on could not tackle when an interception was made. This is no excuse, go back and watch the tape. This yrs. Off. team were more aggressive at attacking an opponent when they intercepted a pass. All of this leads to coaching. JJ, can also be very thankful for the vast improvement in the Defensive Team this season. In 2008 there was mass confusion on the Def. side of the ball; and this 2009 season that mass confusion was on the Off. side of the ball. A drastic change and contrast for a Div. I team with the same H.C.