Started By
Message

re: Saints-Vikings Comparison

Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:18 am to
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:18 am to
quote:

i like how you all totally ignore my post about sidney and colston and just revert back to the same tired argument


fine we will go to that.

The reason Rice's stats are better is because Favre relies on him the most...whereas BRees spread the ball around to many different weapons.


case and point last year...Brees throwing for over 5,000 yards with no receiver over 1,000

quote:

O WERE 11-0 UR 10-1 OHHH SUCK IT


well we havent lossed and your beloved vikes have...we are perfect until proven otherwise and that is eating at you
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:21 am to
quote:

well we havent lossed and your beloved vikes have...we are perfect until proven otherwise and that is eating at you



like i've said before i would rather have a loss becuase there is too much pressure on trying to go 16-0 and there is no reward for achieving that
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:22 am to
quote:

O WERE 11-0 UR 10-1 OHHH SUCK IT


One person made that argument before you said that. You're either intoxicated, retarded, or both. You can make your homer biased arguments all you wan, but at the end of the day you're not going to convert anyone on this board and you'll only come off looking like a total douche. Do yourself a big favor and just stop.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram