Started By
Message
locked post

actual coaching question not involving firing anyone

Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:38 pm
Posted by Chuck U Farley
The 318
Member since Oct 2007
8994 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:38 pm
With the current status of Porter leaving I was thinking, Is it better to have a great coach or a great recruiter. Not at head coach, but an assistant. The recruiter has tons of talent and doesnt have to be a great coach, right? Then great coach gets the most out of what hes got? This seems like an easy question regarding this season, but I think both sides could have a case. Whats your take?
Posted by EmotionalJuice
Member since Sep 2009
308 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:39 pm to
great coach who knows how to utilize the talent he has.
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23485 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:44 pm to
We don't need a great recuiter that cannt coach aka Les
lsu recruits itself anyway
right now, I'll be happy with an avg coach
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37550 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:49 pm to
The coaching staff needs to be a mix of good recruiters and good coaches. Certain coaches will coach up the talent the other coaches bring in.

That's been LSU's problem, we haven't been coaching them up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram