Started By
Message
locked post

Keiland Williams???

Posted on 11/12/09 at 7:27 pm
Posted by LSUfkr
Mansfield, Tx
Member since Oct 2009
15 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 7:27 pm
anyone know why he is in the doghouse?
Posted by SJTiger
Texas
Member since Sep 2005
1521 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 7:29 pm to

Lack of production for 3.7 years.
Posted by Easygeauxingtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2006
548 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 7:35 pm to
273 rushes for 1543 yds with 5.7 yd/carry and 15 tds isn't really a lack of production. Add to the 28 recs for 273 yds with 9.8 yds/catch and 2 tds. To me, sucks that he came here when he did because he could have been a great back if given the chance.
Posted by Rza32
Member since Nov 2008
4269 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 8:44 pm to
Why everytime a post has Keiland's name in the title I have to go into it?
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 8:45 pm to
He hasn't hit the holes hard and made plays. He's out of the d house now and has a chance to be the MAN in 4 games left this year.
Posted by SJTiger
Texas
Member since Sep 2005
1521 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

To me, sucks that he came here when he did because he could have been a great back if given the chance.



Yes, Miles, Crowton and Porter just have it out for the guy.

Please name a top program he would start at?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:05 pm to
Texas, for one
Posted by SJTiger
Texas
Member since Sep 2005
1521 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Texas, for one


Wrong...Up until this year, UT had great backs. Nevertheless, KW would still be getting minimal carries this year. Why cant you chickendicks realize he isnt a starting back in the SEC?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Up until this year, UT had great backs

their RBs were not good last year either

quote:

Why cant you chickendicks realize he isnt a starting back in the SEC?

he was in 2006
Posted by W4LSU
Bannedville
Member since Jan 2009
2355 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:30 pm to
Kw>c. Scott and always has been. Miles is old school big ten, and doesn't like the speedy guys I.e. Trindon. He never plays him or kw...
Posted by Happyboucher
BR
Member since Sep 2007
456 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

chickendicks


Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34400 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:53 pm to
His calves...it's all about his calves.
Posted by treyk89
Member since Oct 2003
2264 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:57 pm to
He's a great runner, but a great runner doesn't always equal a great running back. He's a horrible blocker. Not just horrible, but doesn't seem to have any desire to be good at it.
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

he was in 2006


Not until Tennessee game.

He started vs. UT, Bama, Ole Miss, Arkansas, and Notre Dame.

Before that it was an ugly 3-headed monster of JV, JH, and AB. Hester kept his time and carries. The former all-SEC duo was cut out...especially AB. JV still had a carry or three here and there.
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 10:37 pm to
I thinmk he had three 100 yard games if I am not mistaken in '06.
Posted by cardee2003
Baton Rouge/Tacoma,WA
Member since Jan 2009
2633 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:35 pm to
Everyone has been so hard on Kieland but if he had gotten the opputunities that Scott has gotten he would have great stats
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28856 posts
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Everyone has been so hard on Kieland but if he had gotten the opputunities that Scott has gotten he would have great stats


He got it in the beginning of the year when Scott was not productive and I saw him alot in 07 and him and Scott tore it up in 08. But tis is Miles were talking about here. He makes a decision before the start of the season and the could be playing like crap all year long, but you will not see their backup in unless they get injured.

I don't know if this is from being stubborn or ignorant. He doesn't want to change when he's made a mistake and the only way the backup gets PT is when the starter is injured.
Posted by T-BRO
Cleveland, TX
Member since Sep 2003
1643 posts
Posted on 11/13/09 at 6:44 am to
Miles likes backs who hit the hole hard and move the pile forward. So do I.
KW has always danced around in the backfield too long and seems to go down at first contact.

But here's his chance. He needs to run hard with authority, knock some LB's on their backside and get yards after contact.

I actually think he will do great and everyone will question Miles even more.
But, CS has been the better back.
Posted by pianoman224
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
1479 posts
Posted on 11/13/09 at 6:52 am to
He is a good blocker, he plays mostly on 3rd down to pick up the Blitz, he worked hard at blocking and now is his strong suite.

Miles thinks he's outside back only, and CS is the inside back, we call more inside runs..that is all..
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 11/13/09 at 7:09 am to
quote:

He's a horrible blocker.

well crowton/porter are idiots b/c he's out there for a TON of 3rd downs
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram