- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "a photo of said gash" per sports illustrated
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:23 pm to MondayMorningMarch
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:23 pm to MondayMorningMarch
There was no angle to definitively show ALL of the following required to overturn the call.
1. Julio touching the ball, while,
2. Peterson got a foot in, while,
3. Peterson controlled the ball.
Therefore, the video is inconclusive. Bottom line. It looked like a bad call, but the above is required and simply not there.
I hate contoversy as much as anyone and we've been screwed before too. This however, even if it is indeed a bad call, would not guarantee that you all would have gone 65 yards after netting 11 all quarter.
..now, that being said, let the name calling begin.
1. Julio touching the ball, while,
2. Peterson got a foot in, while,
3. Peterson controlled the ball.
Therefore, the video is inconclusive. Bottom line. It looked like a bad call, but the above is required and simply not there.
I hate contoversy as much as anyone and we've been screwed before too. This however, even if it is indeed a bad call, would not guarantee that you all would have gone 65 yards after netting 11 all quarter.
..now, that being said, let the name calling begin.
5
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News