- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/4/09 at 7:27 pm to LikeKnightsofOld
Anyone who doesn't think that it was intentional grounding in the endzone doesn't understand the spirit of that rule.
I don't care if he MIGHT have been 2 inches outside of the "tackle box". The bottom line is that he was in the pocket and dumped the ball under extreme duress, with the intention of avoiding a sack.
Hell, the old NFL rules would have ruled him "in the grasp".
In no way was he trying to complete a pass. That was obviously intentional grounding, but the refs blew the call and that's the way it goes sometimes.
I don't care if he MIGHT have been 2 inches outside of the "tackle box". The bottom line is that he was in the pocket and dumped the ball under extreme duress, with the intention of avoiding a sack.
Hell, the old NFL rules would have ruled him "in the grasp".
In no way was he trying to complete a pass. That was obviously intentional grounding, but the refs blew the call and that's the way it goes sometimes.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)