- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Do you like 5 WR inside the 10 yard line?
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:31 pm
I think its too crowded. JJ int came on this! They did this several times. However, It does open up the QB draw. Thoughts?
Geaux Tigers
Geaux Tigers
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:31 pm to Dylan
ETA: I don't mind 5 wide. I do like 4 wide with the back, like the guy below me said
This post was edited on 10/3/09 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:31 pm to Dylan
NO!!! I hate 5-WRs in a formation. I love the 4-WR and one back setup.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:33 pm to rpg37
I have no problem with the 5 wide look. What I do hate is when they line up get ready then the whole team looks over at the sideline for 5+ secs. Call the play change it at the line, but stop doing that.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:33 pm to Dylan
i like 5WR and the QB sneak...
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:41 pm to lsu xman
For passing, I think that it can be too crowded in the endzone, because you're also drawing too many defenders into the same space.
I agree that 4 WR and a back would be better. Same number of receiving options, but with the back coming out of the backfield, you have a bit more space, and also have the option of a HB draw, or motioning him out for a QB draw.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the QB draw on short yardage with Jefferson though. He doesn't seem to be confident enough sometimes to just lower his shoulder when he needs to. That perception could just be more of a matter of his indecisiveness on the option though.
I agree that 4 WR and a back would be better. Same number of receiving options, but with the back coming out of the backfield, you have a bit more space, and also have the option of a HB draw, or motioning him out for a QB draw.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the QB draw on short yardage with Jefferson though. He doesn't seem to be confident enough sometimes to just lower his shoulder when he needs to. That perception could just be more of a matter of his indecisiveness on the option though.
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:46 pm to nickg0205
What formation was the two point conversion on?
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:49 pm to Dylan
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/3/09 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:51 pm to trakmak777
quote:
What formation was the two point conversion on?
It was 5 WR but I think his 1st guy was open. I like 5WR but not inside the 5. You don't have time to look at all 5. Your WR all run in to each other if you do have any time.
This post was edited on 10/3/09 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:56 pm to Dylan
I like pounding the ball and hitting the drags and flats inside the ten, which LSU usually does, but it all turned into a W so I'm happy. 
Posted on 10/3/09 at 7:58 pm to Dylan
quote:I was screaming for the QB draw during the game, especially on the missed 2 point attempt. That set up is perfect for the QB draw...
think its too crowded. JJ int came on this! They did this several times. However, It does open up the QB draw. Thoughts?
Popular
Back to top
5





