- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drake Nevis
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:35 am
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:35 am
One of the only bright spots on the D last night. IMO he looked great.
4
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:35 am to lsutigers75
Mr Peterson might have something to say about that... 
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:36 am to lsutigers75
peterson was a beast out there too, imo nevis did a great job, cutrera and coleman played good, i was expecting more from alem and jones though
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:36 am to HOUbengal
Alem needs to learn to stuff the run. He's strictly "sprint at the QB".
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:39 am to lsutigers75
I'd add Downs to the short list.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:41 am to CAT
Drake Nevis was the saving grace on the d-line, but Patrick Peterson was amazing. PP=The Truth 
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:41 am to CAT
Nevis wasn't the only one. Nevis, PP, Downs, Cutrera, and even Brandon Taylor looked good to me.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:43 am to flucobaseball
Nevis, PP, and Cutrera played extremely well. Alem not so much.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:46 am to BallyHOO
quote:
Alem needs to learn to stuff the run. He's strictly "sprint at the QB".
Alem has never gotten out of his "rush linebacker" mentality he had when he was at St Aug. He is a very avg every down defensive end.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:47 am to jtweezy
I thought chad jones played horrible. But peterson was unreal.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:50 am to lsu11
Nevis = Booger.....hopefully
Posted on 9/6/09 at 11:57 am to flucobaseball
I don't understand all the love for Peterson. He did tackle great, but that was usually after his man caught a pass in front of him. Washington must have completed 70% of passes thrown out him.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 12:02 pm to chicageaux_tiger
quote:
I don't understand all the love for Peterson. He did tackle great, but that was usually after his man caught a pass in front of him. Washington must have completed 70% of passes thrown out him
And the announcer said, " I dont know why they keep trying Patterson" cuz they are catching the ball and moving the chains thats why lol... I agree with you totally.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 12:13 pm to glenoaks
If Downs can add some weight and keep his speed. He may be the best the school has seen.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 12:15 pm to chicageaux_tiger
No bump, 5-10 yard cushion in man coverage, crossing routes into open zone = receptions
He was money on vertical passes.
He was money on vertical passes.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 12:19 pm to The Tiger King
quote:
No bump, 5-10 yard cushion in man coverage, crossing routes into open zone = receptions
poor scheme I agree with, but I don't agree with this:
quote:
but Patrick Peterson was amazing. PP=The Truth
or this
quote:
But peterson was unreal
I assume that was meant as amazing and unreal in a good way.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 12:23 pm to lsutigers75
quote:
Drake Nevis
A few guys on D had good individual games. Woods looked really good even though he was double-teamed the entire game. He looked great in pursuing down the line of scrimmage (looks a lot quicker this year). He missed one tackle in the backfield, but other than that... solid.
Kelvin Sheppard was all over the field. Riley looked good (even in coverage). Jacob Cutrera played the game of his life. Peterson was Peterson. Downs is so quick off the ball, he's just not strong enough yet to be as disruptive as he will in the future.
Taylor looked good in run-support, but he looks lost in coverage. Hawkins actually looked fine when he wasn't being mugged by wide receivers on edge-blocking.
ETA: Basically the ends and safeties looked bad last night. Montgomery is going to have to play if we want to get pressure from an end position. And also, let's just say rushing 3 down-linemen wasn't exactly the best scheme on 3rd and long.
This post was edited on 9/6/09 at 12:25 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News