Started By
Message

re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland

Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

explain why 235 = good nfl rb?

like i said, he may be a bruiser in college, but he's not going to be mowing down linebackers in the nfl.


Explain to me where I said 235 = good nfl rb?

You said he won't be a bruiser in the NFL because presumably, he's not big enough?

He weighs 235. As much as post-tequila Lendale White. Who is known as... a bruiser. And he's shorter than White, so more compact.

My point is that there's only one 270 pound bruiser in the NFL - Brandon Jacobs.

If you look at almost every other "bruiser" they are Scott's size. And if you look at Scott's mentality... he runs with a lot of physicality. It's why he was worn down at the end of the last year and his production slowed.
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:52 pm to
ok, charles scott will be a bruiser style runner in the nfl.

but he'll be an inferior pro to keiland.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram