Started By
Message

re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland

Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am to
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am to
quote:

There wasn't really any other option for the cardinals, except for trading down


right, so why wouldn't they have traded down if they thought he was damaged goods and soft?

ap was considered very injury prone going into the draft and he's the best back in the nfl right now. (i realize ap =/= beanie)
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:27 am
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12421 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:28 am to
Why are you assuming that the Cardinals made a good choice in picking him?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he get hurt in the first practice?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
72571 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:36 am to
You need two teams in order to trade down, and the 31st pick in a weak draft isn't appealing at all

and Petersons injuries in college were mostly flukes...breaking your collarbone diving into the endzone is a fluke
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram