- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:51 am to harper6464
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:51 am to harper6464
quote:
he may be a bruiser in college, he's oversized in college. once he gets to the nfl the only thing he's going to bruise is the bench
Like Beanie Wells?
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:54 am to Sammich
im pretty sure beanie is superior to scott in just about everyway. strength and speed being the first two theat come to mind.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:58 am to harper6464
Every scout leading up to draft pretty much called Wells a pussy
McShay said he's the softest player he's ever seen with an injury
McShay said he's the softest player he's ever seen with an injury
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:59 am to harper6464
quote:
im pretty sure beanie is superior to scott in just about everyway. strength and speed being the first two theat come to mind.
Beanie's not strong. Beanie's not fast. You are not smart.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:01 am to DBG
guess that explains why their 08 stats were very similar despite beanie missing 3 games and effected by that injury all year.
the cardinals disagree by the way...
they used their 1st pick on him.
the cardinals disagree by the way...
they used their 1st pick on him.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:03 am to harper6464
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:05 am to Sammich
i didnt say beanie was the fastest, i just said beanie is faster than scott.
beanie also did 25 reps at the combine and had a 10'8 broad...
beanie also did 25 reps at the combine and had a 10'8 broad...
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:06 am to harper6464
Where is that dude who would throw in RM?
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:06 am to harper6464
I'm not disagreeing with you about Scott
I'm just saying Well is soft...and being the 3rd RB taken in a weak RB draft doesn't impress me, FYI
I'm just saying Well is soft...and being the 3rd RB taken in a weak RB draft doesn't impress me, FYI
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:08 am to bmy
quote:
FYI These sites are usually accurate.
signed, brady quinn, aaron rogers etc...
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:09 am to harper6464
quote:
signed, brady quinn, aaron rogers etc...
yes yes, we know.. there are exceptions to every rule. what was your point again? that these sites are (as I said) usually accurate.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:10 am
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:10 am to Chad504boy
How many times does this have to be said?
It's just another HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION!!!
They have to get there first
It's just another HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION!!!
They have to get there first
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:16 am to DBG
quote:
I'm just saying Well is soft...and being the 3rd RB taken in a weak RB draft doesn't impress me, FYI
i cant imagine a team using a 1st round pick on a player who they thought was soft and injury prone basically to be their #1 running option.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:18 am
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:17 am to bmy
quote:
yes yes, we know.. there are exceptions to every rule. what was your point again? that these sites are (as I said) usually accurate.
so we agree they're innacurate. what was your point again?
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:18 am to harper6464
quote:
the cardinals disagree by the way...
they used their 1st pick on him.
Could you post Beanie's "Awesome" NFL stats for all to see?
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:22 am to harper6464
There wasn't really any other option for the cardinals, except for trading down
and Tim hightower is their #1 back
and Tim hightower is their #1 back
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:23 am to Sammich
you do understand that he's a rookie this year right?
and you do realize the total irrelevance of the preseason stats he may or may not have accumulated right?
MIKE BELL RAN FOR 100+YARDS AGAINS THE TEXANS OMGZZZZZZ! HE'S A BETTER RB THAN PIERRE AND REGGIE!!!
and you do realize the total irrelevance of the preseason stats he may or may not have accumulated right?
MIKE BELL RAN FOR 100+YARDS AGAINS THE TEXANS OMGZZZZZZ! HE'S A BETTER RB THAN PIERRE AND REGGIE!!!
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:24 am to harper6464
quote:
so we agree they're innacurate. what was your point again?
usually accurate != inaccurate
closet gump? because you can't read.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am to harper6464
quote:
MIKE BELL RAN FOR 100+YARDS AGAINS THE TEXANS OMGZZZZZZ! HE'S A BETTER RB THAN PIERRE AND REGGIE!!!
He is a better RB than reggie
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News