- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:13 am to SouthOfSouth
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:13 am to SouthOfSouth
i liked the movie, but there was 0 reason to change the ending to the book. It changes everything having harry not stunned IMO, and the fight scene would have made the movie completely legit
2
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:18 am to TigerBait1127
I assume Dumbeldor was just weak from drinking that fluid in the cave thats why he just got owned by Snape correct?
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:21 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
i liked the movie, but there was 0 reason to change the ending to the book. It changes everything having harry not stunned IMO, and the fight scene would have made the movie completely legit
You know, I've read all the books but I've forgotten some things that happened in them. Lots of things actually. I was defending the movie, but after reading the things you've written, I think you're right. Don't get me wrong, I still like the movie, but I agree it could've been better.
And to the people saying you thought Harry was great and all that...he is, but something people forget is that Snape is a beast!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News