Started By
Message
locked post

Should we get Vick

Posted on 6/12/09 at 11:46 pm
Posted by malbu75
Metairie,La
Member since Jul 2008
69 posts
Posted on 6/12/09 at 11:46 pm
he was a good player, but we don't know what the hell he's been doing the past months he was in jail
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
153870 posts
Posted on 6/12/09 at 11:55 pm to
NOT NO BUT frick NO
Posted by DrewSimp82
Shreveport
Member since Apr 2007
1646 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 12:09 am to
frick NO
Posted by malbu75
Metairie,La
Member since Jul 2008
69 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 12:12 am to
i dont want him. don't want a bad attitude in the locker room saying that he doesn't play
Posted by PokerChamp21
Member since Apr 2006
20125 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 12:21 am to
quote:

NOT NO BUT frick NO



:kige:
Posted by Bad Cat
Painted Post, NY
Member since Jan 2004
12091 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 12:34 am to
NOT NO, BUT frick YES!

Bring him in when Brees is having problems against an opponents defensive rush and a few times near the goal line with a set of option plays.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
27308 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 12:38 am to
I wouldn't mind bring him in....but I wouldn't want him to go in more than 5 plays a game unless definitly needed. He would serve as a dominant backup and possibly good trade bait in a couple years.
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 2:06 am to
Somebody asked this a few days ago about Pacman and I'll say the same thing... We don't need a player with issues like this. We already have Drew anyway. Are you really going to take the ball out of the hands of a top 3 qb, to put it in Vick's hands? I wouldn't.
Posted by malbu75
Metairie,La
Member since Jul 2008
69 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 2:14 am to
quote:

NOT NO, BUT frick YES!



LINK

i think this where you got it from bad cat
This post was edited on 6/13/09 at 4:05 am
Posted by Bigpoppat
Drinking a Manhattan
Member since Oct 2008
9269 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 2:25 am to
quote:

Bring him in when Brees is having problems against an opponents defensive rush and a few times near the goal line with a set of option plays


I hope you are joking....

So on goalline situations you want to give the ball to Vick? Seriously? He fumbles more balls than a Bourbon Street hooker.


Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 2:44 am to
quote:

I hope you are joking....

So on goalline situations you want to give the ball to Vick? Seriously? He fumbles more balls than a Bourbon Street hooker.



agreed
Posted by locotiger
Dallas
Member since Jun 2008
3561 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 6:06 am to
im so sick of Vick threads,
Posted by NS Who Dat Nation
BR
Member since Jul 2007
8805 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 8:51 am to
Wow this is such a good freaking idea. I never thought about bringing Mike Vick in as a Saint. Wow and we could get him cheap too!!!! Wow, what a good idea. Someone get Payton and Benson on the phone ASAP!!!!! Wait I live in Mandeville, I'll just go swing by his pad for a beer and tell him myself. Consider Vick signed by 5pm.
Posted by malbu75
Metairie,La
Member since Jul 2008
69 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Wow this is such a good freaking idea. I never thought about bringing Mike Vick in as a Saint. Wow and we could get him cheap too!!!! Wow, what a good idea. Someone get Payton and Benson on the phone ASAP!!!!! Wait I live in Mandeville, I'll just go swing by his pad for a beer and tell him myself. Consider Vick signed by 5pm.
LINK stop hanging out with badcat you must have got it from him two
Posted by Bad Cat
Painted Post, NY
Member since Jan 2004
12091 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 9:00 am to
quote:

So on goalline situations you want to give the ball to Vick?


Having Vick and Reggie in the game at one time would give opposing defenses a lot more to prepare for.

Just think about having Brees, Vick and Reggie in the game at the same time.
Posted by malbu75
Metairie,La
Member since Jul 2008
69 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Having Vick and Reggie in the game at one time would give opposing defenses a lot more to prepare for.


micheal vick would probly leave to go play with his dogs
Posted by discip1ine
East Tennessee
Member since Oct 2007
858 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 10:28 am to
If he's cheap enough? Hell YES!!!
Posted by NachoSancho
NW LA
Member since Jan 2006
472 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 10:29 am to
No!
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10082 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 10:49 am to
Maybe not
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 6/13/09 at 10:51 am to
You probably want to get a new avatar by the way, because Deuce McAllister is no longer a Saint.

After 3 unproductive years out of the past 4, the ridiculous love affair can finally end.

This post was edited on 6/13/09 at 10:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram