- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Tiger and Phil
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:05 pm
These 2 are the excitement of the PGA. Without them, how bad would the TV ratings be.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:07 pm to BayouBengals03
can we stop all the new threads about Tiger?
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:08 pm to clayvg
can we stop all the new threads about Tiger?
Why not talk about the best ever?
Why not talk about the best ever?
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:11 pm to BoomT
quote:
Why not talk about the best ever?
When he gets his 19th Major, then we can have this discussion.
As of now: Jack >> Tiger
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:11 pm to BoomT
go talk about him in one of the other 20 threads already talking about him
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:11 pm to Golfer
quote:
When he gets his 19th Major, then we can have this discussion.
As of now: Jack >> Tiger
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:12 pm to clayvg
go talk about him in one of the other 20 threads already talking about him
Hey man, how bout this. If you don't like the thread then don't read the thing.
Hey man, how bout this. If you don't like the thread then don't read the thing.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:13 pm to BoomT
quote:
can we stop all the new threads about Tiger?
I agree...enough threads available to discuss Tiger, besides several players were better yesterday...
quote:
Why not talk about the best ever?
FWIW, Tiger is the best ever...
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:15 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
FWIW, Tiger is the best ever...
Nicklaus still takes the cake as of today.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:17 pm to Golfer
You guys need to make up your mind. You complain about another Tiger thread, but yet you keep reading and responding. Sound like women. 
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:22 pm to Golfer
Tiger will be winning majors into his mid-50's with the kind of shape he is in, IMO (barring no major injury/accident). There are very few, if any, records that will not be broken by Tiger by the end of his run as a competitive pro.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:25 pm to TheCaterpillar
I like to go by the Hit by the bus scenario. If he got hit by a bus today and died, he would not die the greatest golfer ever. Until he surpasses Jack, he's still #2.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:27 pm to Golfer
Over the first 10 years of their careers...
Money lists: Nicklaus - 4, Tiger - 7
Vardon trophies: Nicklaus - 0, Tiger - 6
(Jack never won a Vardon trophy)
Wins: Nicklaus - 36, Tiger - 54
Major victories: Nicklaus - 9, Tiger - 12
Tiger may retire early, or be forced out by injury, but I think even Fat Jack would tell you that Tiger is better.
Money lists: Nicklaus - 4, Tiger - 7
Vardon trophies: Nicklaus - 0, Tiger - 6
(Jack never won a Vardon trophy)
Wins: Nicklaus - 36, Tiger - 54
Major victories: Nicklaus - 9, Tiger - 12
Tiger may retire early, or be forced out by injury, but I think even Fat Jack would tell you that Tiger is better.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:28 pm to Golfer
quote:
I like to go by the Hit by the bus scenario. If he got hit by a bus today and died, he would not die the greatest golfer ever. Until he surpasses Jack, he's still #2.
I agree, but I believe Tiger in his prime > Jack in his prime.
But, longevity and achievement have to be accounted for and that is why Jack is #1. Tiger just hasn't had the time yet.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:32 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
But, longevity and achievement have to be accounted for and that is why Jack is #1. Tiger just hasn't had the time yet.
And after the first 10 years of MJ's career he only had 3 rings like Kobe. MJ kept the party going though.
When judging guys, longevity has to be a factor.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:33 pm to Golfer
quote:
Jack 18
Tiger 14
career totals have to be taken in context. time frame comparisons are much more relevant at this point.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:37 pm to ForeLSU
Not to mention the level of competition. I would have much rather have competed against Nicklaus competition than what Tiger has to compete with. Jack was great, but what Tiger does on a golf course is unreal.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:38 pm to ForeLSU
How about we bump this thread when Tiger hangs it up?
Popular
Back to top

1




