Started By
Message

re: Who has/had more potential: Clayton or Randle?

Posted on 4/5/09 at 9:44 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432420 posts
Posted on 4/5/09 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I'm just saying they had two different styles of play in college

not really

quote:

The RH and AP comment was that they have vastly different styles of play.

bowe and clayton were pretty much the same WR in terms of style

bowe was just better, but dropped the ball a little more and had to split time with better WRs (but with a better QB)

they both ran the same routes, blocked as well as each other, and were the "big" WR in jimbo's offense
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
35808 posts
Posted on 4/5/09 at 10:01 am to
quote:

bowe was just better


ugh, no he wasnt. they each did certain things better than the other but all you have to do is look at the stats.

i dont think its even in doubt that Clayton was our 2nd best reciever ever. Bowe is top 5 to me. but outside of his last year he wasnt that solid of a reciever. he never had a 1,000 yard season.


and Bowe wasnt really "faster" than Clayton. Clayton was clocked at a 4.52 and Bowe a 4.51. atleast thats not enough to brag about.

and clayton played along D. Henderson who was a very solid reciever and outshined him.

you cant say that Bowe was "just" better and NOT say IMO. bc thats all it is, your own opinion, not a definite fact.

the only fact yo can base it on is statistics, and Clayton has him beat im almost everything outside of TD's
This post was edited on 4/5/09 at 10:06 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram