Started By
Message

re: regarding our qb situation

Posted on 2/11/09 at 7:25 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69447 posts
Posted on 2/11/09 at 7:25 pm to
if you dont agree jefferson should have played sooner then yall are dumb as a brick. hatch was done and jl was sucking sec dick pretty hard. not saying jefferson should have started sooner over jl just seen more snaps then he did behind jl.
Posted by hotrod
BR
Member since Feb 2009
535 posts
Posted on 2/11/09 at 7:38 pm to
Only problem with your post is that it doesnt matter what we think.... what you are really doing is calling LM and GC dumb as bricks.... maybe you should apply for their jobs.

Apparently if you makes statements such as this

quote:

if you dont agree jefferson should have played sooner then yall are dumb as a brick. hatch was done and jl was sucking sec dick pretty hard. not saying jefferson should have started sooner over jl just seen more snaps then he did behind jl.


then you are basically suggesting you know better than the guys getting paid to make these decisions.
Posted by lsusince60
New Iberia
Member since Jan 2005
1426 posts
Posted on 2/11/09 at 7:55 pm to
If JJ starts instead of JL from the beginning then LSU may have had the same record, but a much more experienced and better starting QB for this year. JJ has skills that JL doesn't, period. He can make all the throws JL can, he can get out of trouble, HE LOOKS OFF SAFETIES, and he's played the position longer. JJ will have his bumps this year, but it WILL pay off big in the years to come.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram