- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Measure of success against South Carolina
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:17 pm
If there aren't at least two series in that game where we go 3 and out purely from running the ball three times in a row, then we aren't trying hard enough.
We need be damn near willing to lose a game over this change - it has to be so obnoxious that they have no choice but to start putting more players in the box.
We need be damn near willing to lose a game over this change - it has to be so obnoxious that they have no choice but to start putting more players in the box.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:19 pm to KiaSportage22
I agree with this to an extent.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:27 pm to KiaSportage22
quote:
they have no choice but to start putting more players in the box.
Why put more in the box when 3 will do?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:18 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
Why put more in the box when 3 will do?
You do know that Ole Miss had more than 3 in the box correct. They consistently had 6 to 7 in box and then only rushed 3 and dropped 8 into coverage.
Anyway, LSU needed to be more committed to run in the game. A 3 man rush cannot consistently stop a committed running game. 2 carries by your RBs in the first half won’t get it done.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:32 pm to Tigercowboy
quote:It most certainly can when you have a SWAC level OL Coach and OL personnel.
A 3 man rush cannot consistently stop a committed running game.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:35 pm to KiaSportage22
When you can't run with 3 down lineman, why would the defense put more in the box? Wouldn't be a necessary risk
Posted on 9/30/25 at 2:47 pm to KiaSportage22
quote:
If there aren't at least two series in that game where we go 3 and out purely from running the ball three times in a row, then we aren't trying hard enough.
We need be damn near willing to lose a game over this change - it has to be so obnoxious that they have no choice but to start putting more players in the box.
So, if we run at 3 in the box for two consecutive series and can't get a first down, you think that will force them to put more in the box?

Popular
Back to top
4







