- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Building a home on pylons
Posted on 7/4/24 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 7/4/24 at 3:26 pm
I have some family land that’s in a flood zone. It was wrecked in 2016. I have to build at least 10ft up. I know there is the option for dirt only. But I was curious if anyone has experience with building on pylons and If that is more cost effective? I’m just starting to do some research on it.
Posted on 7/4/24 at 3:53 pm to JoeByron
It’s funny you posted this, I’m currently doing the same thing. I’m going 9’ up. My builder said if you get dirt hauled in, it’s ridiculously expensive. After 2019 there’s some kind of law about hauling in fill. If your property is big enough you can dig a pond and use that dirt. Building a small pad then slab and piers is the cheapest option in a flood zone.
Posted on 7/4/24 at 4:39 pm to Deereman9009a
Better make sure you can insure it once completed, many companies will not write a home built over a certain height. It’s not going to be cheap either way.
This post was edited on 7/4/24 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 7/4/24 at 5:22 pm to JoeByron
I built a house on concrete pilings 9 years ago. Nobody is using wood pilings here anymore. The house is 15 feet above grade. The cost for the pilings was around $70k for a 1,900 ft2 house. That includes a few test borings to see what was below (mostly sand with a little crumbly limestone). An engineer designed the pilings to match the layout of the house and they range from 30 feet down to 55 feet down. The layout of the house is 40x40 because the longest span is 20 feet. I picked 15 feet up because that gets me to the lowest possible flood insurance cost. I can't imagine that building up dirt would be cost effective. The house came out great (it's in a VE flood zone so the land was cheap and it was easy to buy some acreage). I built a wrap around porch (85% of the perimeter, anyway) and I love walking around and enjoying the view. One bonus is that insects mostly don't come up that high, and after a year I ripped out the screening on a screen porch I had included. My builder told me to expect a piling house to cost about 20% to 25% more and he was on the money. All in, the house was around $165 per square foot but I built just before prices escalated and I'm not sure I could do it for $250 per square foot today.
Posted on 7/4/24 at 5:37 pm to JoeByron
You should probably first learn the difference between pylons and pilings!

Posted on 7/4/24 at 8:15 pm to JoeByron
i built a camp for a buddy pre-2016 flood on 12x12 timbers. it was a pita but he didn’t flood in 2016. at that time the timbers were about $325 each vs $275 for pile drive round post, but that wasn’t what he wanted.
Posted on 7/4/24 at 9:19 pm to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Ouch. Yeah I messed that up.
Back to top
4







