- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:18 pm to shel311
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:18 pm to shel311
What’s the worst trade/deal you would accept for Ingram?
Honest question, since you wouldn’t be willing to bring him back for $35M if we find no deals to our liking.
I’d like to move him too, but I’d need a certain level of player back. I’m not taking back a mediocre player and some future 1st’s from a contender like we did in the Jrue trade.
Honest question, since you wouldn’t be willing to bring him back for $35M if we find no deals to our liking.
I’d like to move him too, but I’d need a certain level of player back. I’m not taking back a mediocre player and some future 1st’s from a contender like we did in the Jrue trade.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 5:04 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
I’d like to move him too, but I’d need a certain level of player back. I’m not taking back a mediocre player and some future 1st’s from a contender like we did in the Jrue trade.
Look at that Jrue trade now. It did nothign to make us better, and no we didn't need it to get CJ.
There is no point in trading BI for role players and more picks that we don't really need. You can see he obviously has a lot more value than most of you thought, and we shoudl be using it to upgrade our #1 perimeter scorer position.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News