- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 5 minutes into this mornings Stormy Daniels cross and Judge Merchan is working mighty hard
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to Lsuhoohoo
If the pointless testimony about spanking with a magazine wasn’t bad enough of an error . . .
First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?
Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?
Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:28 pm to Wednesday
quote:
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
“It’s damaging to my case!”?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:43 pm to Wednesday
quote:
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
That's the million dollar question, what's the legal bases for the objection considering it's impugning prior testimony on record?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News