Started By
Message

re: 5 minutes into this mornings Stormy Daniels cross and Judge Merchan is working mighty hard

Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15920 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to
If the pointless testimony about spanking with a magazine wasn’t bad enough of an error . . .

First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?

Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence

I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
98953 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination


“It’s damaging to my case!”?
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5359 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination

That's the million dollar question, what's the legal bases for the objection considering it's impugning prior testimony on record?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram