Started By
Message

re: Is HR6090 a direct threat to the 1st amendment and the Bible?

Posted on 5/7/24 at 7:42 am to
Posted by THog
Member since Dec 2021
2254 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 7:42 am to
Agree. The bill literally ends with a disclaimer that it doesnt negate the 1st ammenment, because the bill is negating the 1st ammendment.

The definition of antisemitism is wide open and includes perceived speech. Definition is from another non-binding act. Holocaust rememberance act i think.
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 7:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram