I get this sentiment. But where do you draw the line on grouping those animals up for slaughter? Decimating a population is pretty radical. I understand that hamas sent rapist, murderers, animals if you will, into Israel. But what if we look at the broader perpetrators of these types of crimes. Mostly men, would it be a fair to advocate that all men should be eradicated (less the ones we need for biological contribution for the existence of humans). The answer is no. There are bad men and good men. Painting with a broad brush is a dangerous endeavor.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by TygerTyger

Houston

Member since Oct 2010

9562 posts

Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:54 pm to jennBN

Nits will become lice.

It's barbaric and terrible. But what was done to those innocent Israeli civilians was as well. If terrible things are going to happen to someone, I vote it be to the ones that are connected to the ones who started it. And there's no convincing me through past grievances or bullshite stories from Hamas that Israel started this. Hamas has been busted too many times lying about atrocities and "who hit who first".

Buzzards need to eat to.

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by GreenRockTiger

vortex to the whirlpool of despair

Member since Jun 2020

47696 posts

Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:58 pm to jennBN

quote:
Mostly men, would it be a fair to advocate that all men should be eradicated

that isn’t at all what I’m saying, don’t be ignorant

The Middle East should’ve been flattened 9/12/2001

This shite is the repercussions from not doing that. Those people are animals, plain and simple. With no regard for you or me or civility.

The point is to get rid of evil. Why were we in Germany in WW2 - to get rid of evil. Those people need to be taught a lesson.

This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 4:05 pm

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board