Started By
Message

re: City of St. George - good or bad for the long term future of GBR area?

Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7311 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:24 pm to
Good.

BR was living an unsustainable lie by supplementing their budget with funds from outside the city. This should make them self examine and spend funds where appropriate. CATS and COA should be first in line.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14686 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

BR was living an unsustainable lie by supplementing their budget with funds from outside the city. This should make them self examine and spend funds where appropriate. CATS and COA should be first in line.
According to the list of parish wide millages;

St. George residents don't pay for CATS, that's funded by Baton Rouge and Baker property taxes and federal grants, not the general fund. It was renewed last year so that's not going away anytime soon.

COA is funded by a parish wide property tax and grants, so their funding won't be affected by St. George incorporation either.

Unless I'm completely wrong about this (always a possibility) St. George incorporation won't do shite to cut funds from the bloated budgets of CATS, BREC, COA, etc. (departments/organizations with a dedicated funding souce.) The cuts will have to come from this list (general fund expenditures).

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram