Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
126479 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

at least not relative to my posts.
You've not posted that much here. However, when supporting others who are forwarding questionable viewpoints, as in this instance, you may get called on that.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
30417 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

You've not posted that much here.

Then you didn't read the thread that you popped into halfway through.

SFP is correct on the impeachment clauses not making any sort of distinction between POTUS' and the judiciary, except to the extent that the CJ presides over a POTUS impeachment trial. Not sure what your point is there.

As far as federal prosecution in office, its really a pointless exercise considering that DOJ is part of the executive branch and it would never happen in practice.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram