- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:44 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:You've not posted that much here. However, when supporting others who are forwarding questionable viewpoints, as in this instance, you may get called on that.
at least not relative to my posts.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:48 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You've not posted that much here.
Then you didn't read the thread that you popped into halfway through.
SFP is correct on the impeachment clauses not making any sort of distinction between POTUS' and the judiciary, except to the extent that the CJ presides over a POTUS impeachment trial. Not sure what your point is there.
As far as federal prosecution in office, its really a pointless exercise considering that DOJ is part of the executive branch and it would never happen in practice.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News